Studio City Employment Lawyers
The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. represents employers and employees in Studio City, California, in litigation and trials.
Studio City Discrimination Lawyers
Originally known as Laurelwood, Studio City is now a neighborhood in the City of Los Angeles. Hugging the northern slopes of the Santa Monica Mountains, Studio City is a community born out of the entertainment industry. Known for the huge CBS Studio Center from which it takes its name, this “Jewel of the Valley,” attracts actors, musicians, and writers, while serving as a hub of the San Fernando Valley. Studio City has a rich history dating back to the early 20th century when it was originally part of the Mack Sennett Studios. Over the years, it has played a significant role in the development of the entertainment industry. Ventura Boulevard is Studio City’s primary commercial and shopping district, featuring a wide array of restaurants, boutiques, theaters, and entertainment venues. It’s a popular destination for both residents and visitors. Although Studio City covers an area which just over six square miles, it is home to almost forty thousand residents. Studio City coves the following zip codes: 91602, 91604, 91607, and 91614. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is headquartered in the City of Los Angeles. Our main office in Los Angeles is literally minutes away from Studio City, which allows us to provide legal services to employees and employers in Studio City, California.
Studio City Employment Laws
The employment relationship between employers and employees in Studio City is governed by a several distinct sets of local, state, and federal law. Local laws governing places of employment in the neighborhood of Studio City include, but are not limited to the City of Los Angeles Wage Ordinance. State laws governing the workplace in Studio City include, the California Constitution, the California Labor Code, the California Government Code, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), and the California Business & Professions Code. Federal laws governing the workplace in Studio City include but are not limited to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), the Americans with Disabilities Act, (“ADA”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”).
How to Find The Best Wrongful Termination Lawyer in Studio City
Finding the best employment attorney in Studio City, California, can be a challenging task. Studio City, being a part of a bustling metropolitan area, offers its residents numerous options when it comes to legal representation. This abundance of law firms can make the process of selecting the right labor lawyer a daunting one. A typical Google search for “Studio City employment lawyer” yields a multitude of results, including both paid advertisements and organic listings. This sheer volume of choices can make it difficult for individuals to discern the most suitable attorney for their specific needs. Identifying a skilled attorney well-versed in employment law, with substantial experience in handling employment disputes, is not always straightforward. While online searches for “Studio City employment lawyer” or “labor lawyer in Studio City” are a common approach, one of the most effective methods for distinguishing exceptional lawyers from the rest is to read client reviews. These testimonials provide valuable insights into an attorney’s track record and the quality of service they offer. For Studio City residents seeking an employment lawyer, the Akopyan Law Firm is here to provide a reliable solution. Our team of labor and employment lawyers collectively boasts well over a decade of experience in employment law. Our extensive track record demonstrates our ability to secure favorable outcomes for both employers and employees alike. We prioritize quality over quantity, dedicating ourselves to delivering tailored and effective legal representation to our clients. Our lawyers take pride in spending their time in the courtroom, advocating passionately for our clients’ rights, rather than focusing on gimmicky advertising campaigns. At the Akopyan Law Firm, we invite you to explore our client reviews, which attest to our unwavering commitment to providing exceptional legal services. Our convenient location, just minutes away from Studio City, ensures that we can be your local legal powerhouse, offering strength and support when you need it the most. If you are in Studio City, California, and require an employment lawyer, reach out to the Akopyan Law Firm. Discover the difference of having a dedicated legal advocate with a proven track record in your corner.
We Can Help Studio City Residents With Cases Involving:
Featured Employment Case
E.E.O.C. v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 720 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1983)
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and suspended black employees appealed from ruling of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Lawrence T. Lydick, J., that disciplinary suspensions imposed on the employees did not violate opposition clause of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court of Appeals, Fletcher, Circuit Judge, held that the suspended employees’ conduct in writing a letter to local school board, a customer of employer, protesting an affirmative action award to employer was a permissible form of protected opposition to discriminatory practices. the Court’s opinion provided in part as follows: Plaintiff has burden of proving a prima facie case of discrimination based on opposition to an unlawful employment practice by showing that he has engaged in statutorily protected expression, that he has suffered an adverse employment action, and that there is a causal link between the protected expression and the adverse action; if plaintiff succeeds in proving the prima facie case, burden shifts to defendant to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action; if defendant carries that burden, plaintiff has opportunity to prove by preponderance of the evidence that stated reason was not defendant’s true reason for acting, but a pretext for discrimination. For an employee’s statement to be protected under opposition clause of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it cannot be “opposed to an unlawful employment practice” unless it refers to some practice by employer that is allegedly unlawful; it is not necessary, however, that the practice be demonstrably unlawful since opposition clause protection will be accorded whenever the opposition is based on a “reasonable belief” that employer has engaged in an unlawful employment practice
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results