San Jacinto Employment Lawyers
The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stands ready to fight for the rights of workers in San Jacinto dealing with discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, or other illegal conduct in the workplace. The firm also stands ready to provide small businesses in San Jacinto economical and efficient solutions to problems involving employment law. Our substantial experience in approaching employment disputes from both sides gives us rare insight into the mindset of the opponent, which truly goes a long way to achieving the best possible outcome.
About San Jacinto, California
San Jacinto is a city located in Riverside County. It is home to more than 45,000 residents. It covers approximately twenty five square miles and encompasses the following zip codes: 92581, 92502, and 92583. Located at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains and adjacent to the San Jacinto River, the City of San Jacinto has much to offer residents and businesses alike. Uncongested traffic flows as freely as the clean, crisp air. A quaint and revitalized Main Street, affordable housing, shopping venues, and excellent golf represent a few of the many amenities to enjoy in San Jacinto.
The Best San Jacinto Employment Lawyers
Finding the right labor lawyer in San Jacinto can be a challenging task due to the multitude of law firms with varying approaches. Not every employee attorney in San Jacinto will be a suitable match for every case. Some employment lawyers may prioritize quick and easy low-value settlements over engaging in a protracted legal battle that could lead to a resolution that truly reflects the case’s full value.
When conducting an internet search for “employment lawyer San Jacinto” or “wrongful termination attorney in San Jacinto,” you’re likely to encounter numerous paid advertisements from lawyers willing to take the easy approach. However, at the Akopyan Law Firm in San Jacinto, California, our labor lawyers are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for each client, regardless of the complexity of the case or the level of effort required. Our dedication to delivering high-quality legal work compels us to limit our caseload, ensuring that every employee who becomes our client is treated like family.
We take pride in providing first-class personal service, and we invite you to see what our clients have to say about their experiences with us. The relationships we build with our clients often extend beyond the duration of their cases. Our San Jacinto employment lawyers vigorously advocate for our clients, as evidenced by the excellent results we have achieved.
If you are searching for employment lawyers in San Jacinto, contact us today for a complimentary case evaluation. With our offices conveniently located in Riverside, Orange, and Burbank, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from San Jacinto. Our employment lawyers are prepared to offer world-class services and top-notch representation to the residents of San Jacinto.
We Can Help San Jacinto Residents With:
Featured Employment Case
Slatkin v. Univ. of Redlands, 88 Cal. App. 4th 1147, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 480 (2001)
A Jewish professor brought action against a university to recover for discriminatory denial of tenure application. The Superior Court, San Bernardino County, No. SCV46132, Carl E. Davis, J. (Retired), entered summary judgment in favor of university. Professor appealed. The Court of Appeal, Richli, J., held that denial of tenure application was not based on anti-Semitic bias. The opinion states in part as follows: “Academic catfighting or anti-Semitism? Dr. Wendy Slatkin claims the University of Redlands (the University) refused to grant her tenure because she is Jewish. The University responds that it refused to grant her tenure because of perceived deficiencies in her teaching. Unfortunately for the University, there was evidence that several of the people involved in the tenure decision were prejudiced against her. Fortunately for the University, the same evidence showed they were prejudiced against her as a matter of academic politics, rather than anti-Semitism. Dr. Slatkin introduced no admissible evidence that anti-Semitism played any role in the denial of tenure. The trial court granted the University’s motion for summary judgment. We will affirm.
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results