San Dimas Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of San Dimas, regardless of whether they are employees or employers.  If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.

San Dimas, California

San Dimas is a City in the easternmost section of the San Gabriel Valley.  It covers approximately sixteen square miles, and encompasses the following zip codes: 91724, 91741, 91750, and 91773. San Dimas is a community whose roots go deep into the nineteenth century. The first Americans arriving in the locality presently known as San Dimas were a band of explorers headed by Jedediah Strong Smith, who camped at a Cienega (marshy area), later called Mud Springs, in 1826. A monument on E. Arrow Highway marks the approximate location.  In 1837 two Spanish Dons, Señor Ignacio Palomares and Señor Ricardo Vejar came into these vast semi-arid and wilderness pastures. Their immense land grant was christened Rancho San Jose and was a range for vast herds of cattle. The favorite mythical story is that outlaws operating from inaccessible haunts in the San Dimas Canyon, often made raids on these cattle. Some claim they (the outlaws) were renegade Indians. Señor Palomares, who had come from Sonora, Mexico, where there had been a village called San Dimas, angrily referred to Dismas, the repentant thief of the cross. The story has it that Don’s allusion suggested a name for the canyon – “San Dimas Canyon.” The City of San Dimas assumed its name from the canyon.  An era of droughts and financial reverses resulted in the break-up of the California Rancho. Meanwhile, the Mud Springs had become the location for a station of the Banning Stage Line, with Dennis Clancy in charge. In the 1860s, the Clancy family were the first American residents and their two children the first to be born here. The Mud Springs site on Palomares Street has long been dry.  The Teague family, the first farmers to settle in this area, came in 1878. They leased large acreage upon which they raised grain until the citrus era dawned, and San Dimas became the “Queen of the citrus belt” in Southern California. With the growth of the Los Angeles metropolitan area, the citrus groves of the early 1900s have, in turn, given way to urbanization, and in 1960 (August 4) the citizens of San Dimas incorporated as a city so that they might chart the course of their development more effectively. Since its incorporation in 1960, the unprecedented growth of San Dimas has transformed the City from a primarily rural area to a well-balanced community offering industrial, commercial, and residential living. The completion of new freeways (Foothill and Orange Freeways) will benefit the City since it is in a fortunate position to take advantage of this easy access to markets. In addition to the 1,700 acre Frank G. Bonelli Recreational Area, which lies within the City boundaries, there are many parks such as San Dimas Canyon Park, a city-owned golf course (San Dimas Canyon Golf Club), and over 27 miles of equestrian trails for riding. The city services include an extensive recreational program for youth and senior citizens, and the City boasts a new modern City Hall, with excellent provisions made for County Sheriff and Fire Departments, along with a beautiful Los Angeles County Library and Engineering Regional Office. A bright future lies ahead for San Dimas. Its growth is based upon a solid foundation, and the projections are that in a decade, its population will reach 40,000, and its reputation as a City that tries “to preserve the western spirit” will grow with the population growth. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. has offices in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside all of which are only minutes away from San Dimas. Our employment lawyers stand ready to provide legal services to both employees and employers in San Dimas.

Who Is The Best Employment Lawyer in San Dimas?

The picturesque community of San Dimas, California, thrives as a hub of activity, attracting residents seeking the tranquility of suburban life amidst the bustling backdrop of Southern California. Within this vibrant community, individuals faced with legal challenges related to employment often embark on a quest to find the right attorney to advocate for their rights and interests. However, the abundance of legal practitioners in the area can make this search a daunting endeavor. In today’s digital age, many individuals initiate their pursuit of legal counsel by turning to the internet, employing search queries like “San Dimas employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in San Dimas.” While this approach aims to simplify the process, it frequently results in an inundation of paid advertisements from attorneys and law firms situated near and far. The task of discerning which attorney possesses the precise skills and experience tailored to a particular case can become convoluted. This predicament is compounded by the realization that not all attorneys share the same ethos or methodology when addressing labor-related disputes. Some legal professionals may prioritize expeditious resolutions, opting for swift and amicable settlements that minimize conflict. In contrast, others may advocate for a more protracted legal battle, striving to secure a comprehensive and full-value resolution on behalf of their clients. In the midst of this complex landscape, the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., distinguishes itself through a steadfast commitment to a unique and client-centric philosophy. Our team of highly accomplished San Dimas labor lawyers firmly believes that every client, regardless of their case’s complexity or scope, deserves nothing less than the highest level of legal representation. At our firm, unwavering dedication to delivering exceptional quality consistently takes precedence over quantity. A defining characteristic of our approach is our conscious decision to limit our caseload, ensuring that each client benefits from the undivided attention and meticulous detail we bring to their case. We do not view our clients as mere case files; we regard them as valued members of our professional family, consistently delivering a level of personal service that exceeds industry standards. Our commitment to excellence is underscored by the enduring and meaningful relationships we forge with our clients. Remarkably, these relationships often extend far beyond the resolution of their respective cases, highlighting our dedication to being more than just legal representatives. We are staunch advocates and unwavering allies for our clients’ rights and interests. Our proven track record stands as a testament to our unwavering belief in fighting tirelessly for our clients. If you find yourself searching for employment lawyers in San Dimas, we cordially invite you to reach out to us today. The Akopyan Law Firm is poised and ready to provide world-class legal services and top-tier representation to the residents of San Dimas, California, with our conveniently located offices just minutes away.

We Stand Ready To Help With:

Featured Employment Case

Castro-Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc., 2 Cal. App. 5th 1028, 207 Cal. Rptr. 3d 120 (2016)
A former employee sued for disability discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination, and retaliation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), as well as wrongful termination in violation of public policy. The Superior Court granted summary judgment for the employer.  The Court of Appeal, Flier, J., held that: (1) the employee’s association with a physically disabled person was itself a “physical disability” under FEHA; (2) a fact issue existed as to whether supervisor’s stated justification for terminating employee was pretext for discrimination; and (3) a fact issue existed as to whether there was a causal link between employee’s complaints to employer and his termination.  The Court of Appeal explained in its opinion that “FEHA provides a cause of action for associational disability discrimination, although it is a seldom-litigated cause of action. (Rope v. Auto–Chlor System of Washington, Inc. (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 635, 656–657, 163 Cal.Rptr.3d 392 (Rope), superseded by statute on another ground.) As to disability discrimination generally, FEHA makes it unlawful for an employer, “because of the … physical disability … of any person, … to discharge the person from employment … or to discriminate against the person … in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.” (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a).) The very definition of a “physical disability” embraces association with a physically disabled person. FEHA explains that the phrase “ ‘physical disability’ … includes a perception … that the person is associated with a person who has, or is perceived to have” a physical disability. (§ 12926, subd. (o).) Accordingly, when FEHA forbids discrimination based on a disability, it also forbids discrimination based on a person’s association with another who has a disability.”

 Avvo Rating 10 Superb


Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision