Lakewood Employment Attorneys
The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of Lakewood, regardless of whether they are employees or employers. If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.
Lakewood, California
Lakewood is a city situated in southeast Los Angeles, and is home to more than 80,000 residents. It covers approximately ten square miles. Lakewood’s incorporation was in 1954. Thus, Lakewood is a post-World War II planned community. WWII veterans could get home loans with no down payment and a 30-year mortgage at only 4 percent interest. On the first day of sales, March 24, 1950, an estimated 30,000 people lined up to walk through a row of seven model houses. By the end of April, more than 200,000 people had flocked to the Lakewood Park sales office and more than 1,000 families had purchased homes (30 per day on average). On one occasion, 107 homes were sold in just one hour. The building of Lakewood broke records. Empty fields became 17,500 houses in less than three years. As the unincorporated Lakewood grew to a community of more than 70,000 residents, so grew its municipal needs. Lakewood in 1953 had three choices: be annexed to nearby Long Beach, remain unincorporated and continue to receive county services, or incorporate as a city under a novel plan that continued county services under contract. In 1954, residents chose the latter option and voted to incorporate as a city. With offices in Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Oxnard, Temecula, Rancho Cucamonga, Costa Mesa, Culver City, and San Diego, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Lakewood. Our employment lawyers stand ready to provide world-class services and top-notch representation to the residents of Lakewood.
Ways To Identify The Best Employment Lawyers in Lakewood
Lakewood boasts a vibrant community, and when it comes to legal representation, the choices are abundant. A quick online search for “employment lawyer Lakewood” or “wrongful termination attorney Lakewood” will inundate you with paid advertisements from lawyers far and wide. Selecting the right attorney, one with the essential expertise and experience, can indeed feel like navigating a maze when your only guide is a digital ad. Enter the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., where we rise above the competition with a profound commitment to excellence. Our team of attorneys collectively boasts nearly two decades of experience, and our track record speaks volumes about our prowess. Whether you’re an employee seeking justice or an employer in need of astute legal counsel, our attorneys have consistently delivered success in the realm of employment law. What truly sets us apart is our unwavering dedication to quality over quantity. Unlike many law firms that chase after every case that comes their way, we take a different approach. We prioritize depth over breadth, ensuring that each case we take on receives the utmost attention and expertise it deserves. At Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., every client is more than just a number; they’re a unique legal challenge we are determined to conquer. With our conveniently located offices just minutes away from Lakewood, we are poised and ready to provide residents with legal representation of the highest caliber. When you choose us, you’re not just hiring an attorney; you’re gaining a dedicated partner in your pursuit of justice.
Our Firm Can Help Lakewood Residents With:
Featured Articles:
Protections Under FEHA for Workers with Cancer in California
📌 Key Takeaways FEHA Protections for Cancer Patients: California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) recognizes cancer as a protected medical condition, offering legal safeguards against discriminatory treatment in the workplace. Wrongful Termination Context: Termination of employment may be wrongful and illegal under FEHA if it is connected to a cancer diagnosis, especially when adverse actions follow disclosure or requests for accommodation. Reasonable Accommodation and Interactive Process: Employers must engage in a collaborative good faith interactive process to explore reasonable accommodations for employees with qualifying conditions unless they can show undue hardship. Impacts of Job Loss Post-Diagnosis: Termination during or after cancer treatment can disrupt financial stability and access to care, making employment continuity critically important. Remedies May Be Available: If wrongful termination is found under FEHA, remedies may include reinstatement, compensation, or implementation of accommodations. This article offers a foundational understanding of how FEHA may protect workers with cancer, reinforcing the importance of legal insight when employment concerns arise. A cancer diagnosis can drastically alter the rhythms of everyday life. For many working adults in Los Angeles, balancing treatment with the realities of employment introduces a new layer of complexity. When workplace decisions change abruptly after an employer learns about a diagnosis, questions may arise about whether those actions align with California's legal protections. Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), certain medical conditions—including cancer—may trigger specific workplace protections. FEHA prohibits covered employers from discriminating against employees based on a known or perceived disability, which includes... Read more
Challenging Employer Pretexts in California Heart Attack Termination Cases
📌 Key Takeaways Legal Framework for Disability Termination Claims: California Government Code § 12940 and the federal ADA prohibit employers from terminating qualified employees due to a disability, including post-heart attack conditions. Pretext and Burden-Shifting Standard: On summary judgment disability discrimination cases are subject to the McDonnell Douglas framework, where employees must show a prima facie case, employers must state a lawful reason, and claimants may then demonstrate that the reason is pretextual. Indicators of Discriminatory Motive: Red flags such as shifting employer justifications, sudden negative performance documentation, or selective policy enforcement may support an inference of unlawful termination. Failure to Accommodate: Lack of engagement in the interactive process or disregard for appropriate diagnostic and clinical evaluation may signal legal noncompliance with disability accommodation duties. Comparative Treatment Evidence: When similarly situated non-disabled employees are retained under similar conditions, it may strengthen claims that termination was discriminatory. Understanding how courts examine timing, documentation, and comparative evidence helps readers recognize legal protections in post-heart attack termination cases. For individuals in Los Angeles recovering from a heart attack, being terminated shortly after returning to work can be both a personal and legal inflection point. While employers may cite neutral reasons such as restructuring or performance, disability laws under California Government Code § 12940 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., provide protections when those reasons conceal discriminatory motives. This article explores the legal concept of pretext—a seemingly legitimate justification masking unlawful intent—and how it functions in... Read more
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results