La Palma Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of La Palma, regardless of whether they are employees or employers.  If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.

La Palma, California

La Palma is city located in Orange County.  La Palma covers less than two square miles but is home to more than 15,000 residents.  La Palma lies within zip code 90623. With 18 dairies dotting an area of 1.76 square miles, the City of La Palma in 1955 looked nothing like it does today. In fact, the City of La Palma was first incorporated as Dairyland and remained so until the dairies relocated. The name was changed in 1965 to La Palma in reflection of Orange County’s Spanish heritage and the City’s main street, La Palma Avenue. Soon after the small farming community began its life, City planners decided that the City should benefit from a long-term program for orderly development. he Civic Center and Central Park, now La Palma’s premier gathering places, were among the first projects to be completed to better the community. The City’s major redevelopment project, Centerpointe, added new commercial and light industrial uses in the early 1980s. La Palma is a well balanced city which prides itself on a responsive municipal government and a strong sense of community. The City’s small town character allows residents to live in quiet and friendly neighborhoods. With one of the lowest crime rates in Orange County, La Palma is a place where residents can rest easy and enjoy hometown living. The City has been ranked one of America’s Best Places to Live, by Money Magazine in 2007, 2011, 2013, and 2015.

Your Quest For the Best Employment Lawyer in La Palma Ends Now

La Palma is indeed a thriving community, and residents may have numerous options when it comes to legal representation. However, selecting the right attorney for your specific employment law needs is crucial to ensure a positive outcome for your case. Online searches for “employment lawyer La Palma” or “wrongful termination attorney La Palma” often yield paid advertisements from lawyers across various practice areas. It can be challenging for individuals to discern an attorney’s expertise and experience solely based on these advertisements. The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. understands the importance of choosing an attorney who is well-versed in employment law and experienced in handling trials and litigation. Each of our attorneys has nearly two decades of experience and a proven track record of success in representing both employees and employers. Our approach is centered on quality rather than quantity, which means we are dedicated to providing personalized and effective legal representation to each client. With offices located just minutes away from La Palma, we are readily available to serve the community. We pride ourselves on delivering world-class services and top-notch representation to all La Palma residents, whether you are an employee seeking justice or an employer facing legal challenges. If you are in need of experienced and dedicated employment lawyers, please do not hesitate to reach out to us. We are here to help you achieve the best possible outcome for your case.

We Offer Legal Services to La Palma Employers and Employes In Matters Involving:

Featured Articles:

  • discrimination law

California’s Diabetes Discrimination Laws: What Employers Cannot Do Under FEHA

📌 Key Takeaways FEHA Offers Broader Protections Than Federal Law: California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) may provide greater protection than the federal ADA by applying a more inclusive definition of disability and requiring a proactive, individualized approach from employers. Diabetes-Related Discrimination May Violate State Law: Employment decisions such as termination, demotion, or denial of promotion that are tied to a diabetes diagnosis could potentially violate Government Code §12940(a), especially if causation is established. Reasonable Accommodations Must Be Seriously Considered: Employers in California may be required to engage in a good faith, interactive process and assess accommodation requests on an individualized basis, rather than rely on general policies or assumptions. Retaliation and Hostile Environments Are Also Covered: FEHA may prohibit employers from punishing employees for asserting their rights, including requesting accommodations, and from fostering conditions that could lead to constructive discharge. Legal Outcomes Depend on Specific Facts and Context: Whether conduct constitutes a violation often depends on the causal connection between the employer’s action and the employee’s condition or protected activity—evaluated by the trier of fact. This article offers information on how California law may protect employees with diabetes from specific types of employer conduct. For those navigating chronic medical conditions in the workplace, the full content can provide critical context and legal understanding. Managing a chronic health condition like diabetes while working in a demanding professional environment can be daunting. When medical needs intersect with job responsibilities, questions about legal rights may arise—especially when an employer's actions... Read more

  • employment attorney

Understanding the Interactive Process Requirement for Employees with Diabetes Under California Law

📌 Key Takeaways Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process May Trigger Statutory Liability Under California Government Code § 12940(n), employers have a legal obligation to initiate a timely, good faith interactive process when a disability—such as diabetes—is known or accommodation is requested. Noncompliance may lead to legally actionable FEHA violations. Interactive Process Must Be Ongoing and Individualized Employers are required to conduct a personalized and evolving dialogue with the employee. A one-time conversation may not fulfill this statutory duty, particularly if no undue hardship evaluation is documented. Employees with Diabetes Hold Specific Legal Rights Under FEHA California law grants employees the right to participate meaningfully in the accommodation process, to request confidentiality for medical information, and to be protected from retaliation for asserting these rights. Legal Consultation Is Strongly Recommended for Potential Violations Employees experiencing delayed responses, superficial engagement, or termination after accommodation requests should consult a California employment attorney promptly due to strict statutory time limits. By understanding these legal obligations and protections, readers can better assess when employer conduct may cross the line into a statutory violation—and why early legal consultation is essential. California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) establishes a statutory requirement that employers must engage in a timely, good faith interactive process with employees who have a known disability—such as diabetes—when accommodation may be necessary. This process is not optional; under California Government Code § 12940(n), it is a legal duty imposed on covered employers. While many individuals manage diabetes independently, employment conditions... Read more

Avvo Rating 10 Superb

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$400 ThousandEmployment: Constructive Termination
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$210 ThousandEmployment: Family Leave Retaliation
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$165 ThousandEmployment: Wage & Hour Violations
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Associational Disability Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision