La Palma Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of La Palma, regardless of whether they are employees or employers.  If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.

La Palma, California

La Palma is city located in Orange County.  La Palma covers less than two square miles but is home to more than 15,000 residents.  La Palma lies within zip code 90623. With 18 dairies dotting an area of 1.76 square miles, the City of La Palma in 1955 looked nothing like it does today. In fact, the City of La Palma was first incorporated as Dairyland and remained so until the dairies relocated. The name was changed in 1965 to La Palma in reflection of Orange County’s Spanish heritage and the City’s main street, La Palma Avenue. Soon after the small farming community began its life, City planners decided that the City should benefit from a long-term program for orderly development. he Civic Center and Central Park, now La Palma’s premier gathering places, were among the first projects to be completed to better the community. The City’s major redevelopment project, Centerpointe, added new commercial and light industrial uses in the early 1980s. La Palma is a well balanced city which prides itself on a responsive municipal government and a strong sense of community. The City’s small town character allows residents to live in quiet and friendly neighborhoods. With one of the lowest crime rates in Orange County, La Palma is a place where residents can rest easy and enjoy hometown living. The City has been ranked one of America’s Best Places to Live, by Money Magazine in 2007, 2011, 2013, and 2015.

Your Quest For the Best Employment Lawyer in La Palma Ends Now

La Palma is indeed a thriving community, and residents may have numerous options when it comes to legal representation. However, selecting the right attorney for your specific employment law needs is crucial to ensure a positive outcome for your case. Online searches for “employment lawyer La Palma” or “wrongful termination attorney La Palma” often yield paid advertisements from lawyers across various practice areas. It can be challenging for individuals to discern an attorney’s expertise and experience solely based on these advertisements. The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. understands the importance of choosing an attorney who is well-versed in employment law and experienced in handling trials and litigation. Each of our attorneys has nearly two decades of experience and a proven track record of success in representing both employees and employers. Our approach is centered on quality rather than quantity, which means we are dedicated to providing personalized and effective legal representation to each client. With offices located just minutes away from La Palma, we are readily available to serve the community. We pride ourselves on delivering world-class services and top-notch representation to all La Palma residents, whether you are an employee seeking justice or an employer facing legal challenges. If you are in need of experienced and dedicated employment lawyers, please do not hesitate to reach out to us. We are here to help you achieve the best possible outcome for your case.

We Offer Legal Services to La Palma Employers and Employes In Matters Involving:

Featured Articles:

  • terminating an employee shortly after a heart attack

California Employer Obligations After an Employee’s Heart Attack

📌 Key Takeaways Employer Obligations Triggered by Awareness: California employers must begin the interactive process under FEHA when they become aware—directly or indirectly—of an employee’s heart-related medical condition that may qualify as a disability. Interactive Process is Mandatory: Once aware, employers are legally required to initiate a timely, good faith interactive process to explore appropriate workplace accommodations tailored to the employee’s individual limitations. Reasonable Accommodations Must Be Considered: Employers must evaluate potential modifications such as adjusted schedules or reduced duties unless such changes would impose an undue hardship on business operations. Legal Risk from Premature Termination: Terminating an employee shortly after a heart attack without engaging in the required process may expose employers to claims of FEHA violations, including discrimination and wrongful termination. Documentation is Legally Significant: Accurate records of communications, evaluations, and decisions made during the accommodation process can support compliance or raise questions if omitted. This article provides essential context for understanding how California law protects employees recovering from serious medical events in the workplace. When a California employee suffers a heart attack, their path to recovery often includes not only medical challenges but also uncertainty about returning to work. In these moments, employers carry specific legal obligations under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)—California’s comprehensive employment discrimination law. These responsibilities are not merely administrative; they are legally mandated safeguards that can significantly affect an individual’s livelihood and long-term financial stability. Understanding when these duties arise, what they require, and how they function in the context of ... Read more

  • heart attack discrimination in the workplace

Signs of Disability Discrimination

📌 Key Takeaways Discriminatory Termination Timing: Termination of employment occurring shortly after a heart attack or medical disclosure may suggest a discriminatory motivation, particularly when it follows a sudden role changes or comment about a disability. Accommodation Failures: Employers are legally required under FEHA to engage in an interactive process for the purpose of identifying reasonable accommodations for a disability; neglecting or denying this process without assessment may indicate non-compliance. Workplace Treatment Changes: Unexplained changes in performance reviews, project assignments, or workplace dynamics following an employee’s disclosure to an employer of a heart condition could signal subtle forms of discrimination. Documentation and Timelines Matter: Maintaining records of employer communication and understanding California’s procedural deadlines—such as the three-year limit to file with the CRD—is essential for protecting legal rights. Hypothetical Example for Context: A scenario involving exclusion, denied accommodations, and performance downgrades illustrates how multiple subtle changes can collectively raise discrimination concerns. Recognizing these warning signs early can support individuals in navigating workplace challenges while focusing on recovery. The article below provides greater depth for those evaluating potential legal concerns under California law. Experiencing a heart attack can be life-altering—not only physically but professionally. For workers in Los Angeles and across California, returning to the workplace after such a medical event should involve support and fairness, not fear or bias. Unfortunately, some employees may encounter subtle or overt changes in the workplace that raise questions about whether they're facing discrimination tied to their medical condition. Understanding the signs of heart attack ... Read more

 Avvo Rating 10 Superb

   

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$400 ThousandEmployment: Constructive Termination
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$210 ThousandEmployment: Family Leave Retaliation
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision