Granada Hills Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for both employers and employees in Granada Hills, California.

Granada Hills, California

Granada Hills is a residential neighborhood in the City of Los Angeles.  It is situated in the center-north section of the San Fernando Valley and is home to more than 50,000 Angelenos. The neighborhood is comprised of two administrative sections: Granada Hills North, and Granada Hills South.  Granada Hills covers approximately fifteen square miles and encompasses the following zip code: 91344. Its history is closely tied to the broader development of the San Fernando Valley and the city of Los Angeles.  With the arrival of Spanish explorers in the late 18th century, the land was claimed as part of the Spanish mission system and divided into vast ranchos. In the 19th century, during the Mexican era, the land that encompasses Granada Hills was part of the Rancho San Fernando Rey, a massive land grant. Following the Mexican-American War and the acquisition of California by the United States, the ranchos were broken up and sold to private landowners. The process of subdividing and selling these lands began to transform the San Fernando Valley into an agricultural region. In the early 20th century, as Los Angeles began to expand and grow rapidly, the San Fernando Valley, including the area around Granada Hills, saw increased development and settlement. Agricultural activities, particularly citrus farming, played a significant role in the local economy. The name “Granada” was given to the area by real estate developer and investor Henry E. Huntington in the 1910s, inspired by the lush, green landscape reminiscent of the Spanish city of Granada. The community was marketed as an idyllic suburban enclave, and it began to attract new residents looking for a quieter and more suburban lifestyle. The completion of the Los Angeles Aqueduct in 1913, which brought water to the region from the Owens Valley, was a significant milestone in the development of Granada Hills and the San Fernando Valley as a whole. It facilitated agriculture and population growth. The post-World War II era brought a housing boom to Granada Hills, with suburban development and the construction of single-family homes becoming more prevalent. Families flocked to the area, drawn by its spacious properties and suburban charm. Granada Hills continued to evolve as a residential community, and by the mid-20th century, it was home to a diverse population. The community maintained its suburban character while also contributing to the cultural and economic life of the San Fernando Valley. Today, Granada Hills is known for its tree-lined streets, suburban atmosphere, and strong sense of community. It has a mix of residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, and businesses that serve its residents. The community has preserved elements of its historical character while adapting to the changing needs of its residents, making it a thriving part of the city of Los Angeles. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is headquartered in Los Angeles which is minutes away from Granada Hills.  Thus, the firm provides legal services to both employees and employers in the Granada Hills area.

Do You Seek The Best Employment Lawyers in Granada Hills?

Granada Hills, California, presents a vibrant landscape with a multitude of legal options for both employers and employees. With countless law firms and lawyers offering their services to the residents of Granada Hills, the challenge often lies in discerning the right choice. In a region where employment-related legal issues can be complex and impactful, selecting the best wrongful termination attorney in Granda Hills is of paramount importance. Granada Hills, like many other areas, contends with the constant barrage of attention-grabbing radio advertisements and eye-catching billboards promoting legal services. While these tactics may have their place, they may not always align with the specific needs of your case. At the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C., our attorneys bring nearly two decades of experience to the table. Our track record demonstrates consistent success in advocating for the rights and interests of both employers and employees. We prioritize quality over quantity, choosing to invest our time in the courtroom fighting for our clients rather than recording flashy radio ads. We understand that selecting the right attorney can be challenging, especially when relying solely on internet searches or paid advertisements. To address this, we are more than willing to provide client references upon request, allowing you to hear firsthand from those we have served. Additionally, you can explore our online reviews to further gauge our commitment to excellence. With conveniently located offices near Granada Hills, we are well-prepared to offer top-tier legal representation to the community. Whether you are an employer seeking to navigate employment law complexities or an employee facing workplace challenges, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stands ready to provide the highest caliber of legal services to the residents of Granada Hills.

We Are Ready To Help Granada Hills Residents With Cases Involving:

Featured Employment Case

Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal. 4th 203, 294 P.3d 49 (2013)

After being terminated by the city, a bus driver brought an action against the city under Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) for pregnancy discrimination. The Superior Court entered judgment on a special jury verdict for the driver, and the city appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed and remanded, after which the driver petitioned for review. The Supreme Court granted review, and held that:  (1) FEHA liability requires proof that illegitimate criterion was “substantial motivating factor” in the employment decision; (2) the same-decision defense limits an employee’s relief to declaratory and injunctive relief, fees, and costs; (3) the same-decision defense may be proved by preponderance of evidence; and (4) the city’s failure to plead “same-decision” defense did not bar jury instruction on the defense.  This was an important opinion because it announecd the standard for “mixed motive” cases.  The Court explained, among other things, that under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), when a jury finds that unlawful discrimination was a substantial factor motivating a termination of employment, and when the employer proves it would have made the same decision at the time it made its actual decision absent such discrimination, a court may not award economic or noneconomic damages, backpay, or an order of reinstatement, but the plaintiff may still be awarded, where appropriate, declaratory relief or injunctive relief to stop discriminatory practices, and the plaintiff may be eligible for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. If an employer wishes to assert the “same-decision” defense to recovery of damages, backpay, or an order of reinstatement on employee’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) discrimination action, it should plead that if it is found that its actions were motivated by both discriminatory and nondiscriminatory reasons, the nondiscriminatory reasons alone would have induced it to make the same decision.