Glassell Park Employment Lawyers

The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. is fully prepared to vigorously defend the rights of workers in Glassell Park who are experiencing discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, or any other form of unlawful workplace misconduct. Our dedication extends to offering cost-effective and efficient employment law solutions for small businesses in Glassell Park. Our extensive experience in handling employment disputes from both the employee and employer perspectives equips us with valuable insights into the thought process of the opposing party. This unique perspective significantly contributes to our ability to secure the best possible outcomes for our clients. Whether you are an employee seeking justice or a small business in need of effective employment law solutions in Glassell Park, California, you can rely on our firm for dedicated and expert legal representation tailored to your specific needs. We are here to provide the legal advocacy and support you require to navigate employment law challenges effectively.

About Glassell Park, California

Glassell Park is a neighborhood nestled in the northeastern part of Los Angeles, California, and its history is a compelling tale of transformation and urban development.  The story of Glassell Park takes a significant turn with the arrival of Spanish explorers in the late 18th century. As part of the Spanish colonization of California, the land was divided into vast ranchos, and the area that would become Glassell Park was no exception. Ranchos San Rafael and San Pascual encompassed the region, with ranching and agriculture being the primary activities. During the Mexican-American War in the mid-19th century, California came under American control, and the ranchos were eventually broken up and sold to private landowners. One such landowner was Andrew Glassell, an attorney and early settler in Los Angeles. In the late 19th century, Glassell acquired a portion of the land, and the neighborhood eventually took its name from him. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the development of Glassell Park as a residential community. It became an attractive destination for those seeking suburban tranquility while still being close to the city. The Red Car trolley system, which connected Los Angeles neighborhoods, facilitated the growth of Glassell Park and the surrounding areas. Glassell Park continued to evolve over the decades. In the 20th century, it became home to a diverse population and, like many Los Angeles neighborhoods, played a role in the city’s cultural and economic life. The neighborhood’s charming character was defined by its hilly terrain, tree-lined streets, and a mix of architectural styles, from Craftsman bungalows to mid-century modern homes.

In recent years, Glassell Park has seen renewed interest and revitalization efforts. Its proximity to downtown Los Angeles and its picturesque surroundings have made it an attractive location for both residents and businesses. The neighborhood’s history and character have been preserved, and it remains a vibrant part of the ever-changing tapestry of Los Angeles. Today, Glassell Park stands as a testament to the enduring spirit of urban neighborhoods in Los Angeles, where history, culture, and community converge in a rich and diverse tapestry. It continues to evolve while retaining elements of its historical charm, making it a unique and thriving part of the city. Glassell Park is home to roughly 25,000 residents.  It covers approximately two and a half square miles and encompasses the zip code 90065. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is headquartered in Los Angeles which is just a few miles away from Glassell Park.  Thus, our lawyers stand ready to serve employees and employers in Glassell Park with all their employment law needs.

Are You Loking to Connect With The Best Glassell Park Employment Lawyer?

Securing the right labor lawyer in Glassell Park can indeed be a challenging task. The legal landscape in Glassell Park boasts numerous firms, each with its unique approach and methodology. It’s crucial to understand that not every employee attorney in Glassell Park will be the perfect fit for every case, as strategies and priorities can vary significantly. While some employment lawyers may opt for quick and uncomplicated low-value settlements, others are willing to engage in a more extensive and complex legal battle, ultimately striving for a resolution that fully reflects the case’s value. An online search for “Glassell Park employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in Glassell Park” often yields a plethora of paid advertisements from lawyers who may prefer the easier route. At the Akopyan Law Firm our unwavering objective is to secure the best possible outcome for every client, regardless of the scale of the challenge. Our commitment to delivering exceptional work on every case leads us to selectively limit our caseload, ensuring that each client receives the personalized attention and outstanding representation they deserve. To us, every employee who becomes our client becomes an integral part of our extended family. While we take immense pride in offering top-notch, personalized service, we invite you to explore what our clients have to say and review our online testimonials to witness the satisfaction of our previous clients. The relationships we forge with our clients often extend well beyond the life of the case itself, highlighting our dedication to lasting connections. Our Glassell Park employment lawyers ardently advocate for our clients, as underscored by the outstanding results they have achieved. If you are in search of employment lawyers in Glassell Park who will vigorously champion your cause and prioritize quality and commitment over quantity, we encourage you to reach out to us today for a complimentary case evaluation. Your legal journey begins here, and we are fully prepared to support you at every step.

We Can Help Glassell Park Residents With All Sorts of Employment Disputes, Including Those Which Involve:

Featured Employment Case

Bagatti v. Dep’t of Rehab., 97 Cal. App. 4th 344, 118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 443 (2002)
An employee who had polio and was injured at work sued his employer the Department of Rehabilitation for failing to provide a reasonable accommodation. The Superior Court entered judgment after sustaining the Department’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend, and the employee appealed. The Court of Appeal held that: (1) failure to provide a reasonable accommodation was an unlawful employment practice under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), even if employee did not state a claim for disability discrimination; (2) whether employee’s requested accommodations were unreasonable could not be resolved on demurrer; and (3) employee’s action was not barred by Workers’ Compensation Act.  Although Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) does not require an employer to provide an accommodation that would produce undue hardship to its operation, a plaintiff need not initially plead or produce evidence showing that the accommodation would not impose an undue hardship on the employer; rather, the burden is on the employer to make a showing of undue hardship. Under Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), a failure to make a reasonable accommodation is a separate unlawful employment practice; nothing in FEHA limits an unlawful practice to the unlawful practice of disability discrimination.  The Court noted that the interpretive statement of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), interpreting the federal ADA and setting forth limitations on reasonable accommodation, would not be applied to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), though a federal regulation could be useful to guide the construction of a state statute when the statute was modeled on a federal statute, as interpretive statement was derived from federal ADA statutes that contained restrictions and qualifications on the duty to make reasonable accommodation that were not found in FEHA.  The court observed how state law provides greater protection to employees than does federal law: California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), unlike the ADA, does not require that a reasonable accommodation for disability only be made where the person is a qualified person able to perform the essential functions of the job, nor is there any requirement under the FEHA that an employee has a right to assert the duty of reasonable accommodation only when some kind of adverse employment action has been taken.

 Avvo Rating 10 Superb

   

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision