Coachella Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for both employers and employees in Coachella, California.

Coachella, California

Coachella is a city located in Riverside County.  Coachella is home to more than 41,000 residents.  It covers approximately thirty square miles, and encompasses the following zip code: 92236.

Jason L. Rector was the first man to make a permanent home in Coachella. A native of Iowa, he was born on January 16, 1853 (or 1851 based on various records). He received his education in a private school in Iowa, and then went on to obtain a position in the government postal service, after which he engaged in farming and the real estate business.

Once a barren desert land, the city of Coachella holds a fascinating history of transformation through the development of its railroad system. As the United States expanded westward in the late 19th Century, the Southern Pacific Railroad recognized the potential of the Coachella Valley and sought to establish a connection to this promising desert region.

In 1876 the first railroad tracks were laid throughout the valley, linking it to the expanding network of railways across California. As part of the railroad line, a 3-car side spur was built in what is present-day Coachella. Jason L. Rector, an employee of the Southern Pacific Railroad, was tasked with clearing the wood and mesquite trees in the area.  The siding and surrounding area became known as Woodspur due to the abundance of mesquite wood which was brought to the siding for rail use. The arrival of the railroad marked a turning point for Woodspur (Now Coachella) as it opened up new possibilities for trade and transportation.

Rector eventually settled in Woodspur as the first permanent resident, establishing a town site, and dug the town’s first water well in 1900, providing fresh water to support incoming settlers and irrigation for agriculture. By 1902 Rector organized the Coachella Valley Produce Association which shipped the first car of fruit ever raised in the valley. A packing house was later built in the town, followed shortly by an ice and pre-cooling plant. The rail line was a lifeline for the city, facilitating the export of fresh produce such as dates, citrus fruits, and vegetables, which contributed greatly to the local economy. The goods produced and shipped from Coachella were so outstanding that buyers from major U.S. cities bid for them, and they were advertised throughout the world. As the desert’s climate allowed crops to be grown all year round, the town’s growth and development continued to grow.

Over time, Coachella remained an oasis of agricultural farming, but as automobiles took hold, the railroad’s significance diminished. Despite this, the railroad legacy remains deeply engrained in Coachella’s culture and history. The story of Coachella’s railroad history serves as a testament to the transformative power of transportation and infrastructure that played a role in shaping the destiny of this desert city, leaving a lasting impact on its prosperity and growth.

The history of the city and town of Coachella dates back more than 100 years to 1898 when the Coachella Valley was merely a part of the great undeveloped sand waste of the Colorado River basin. At that time, a heavy growth of mesquite and greasewood covered the valley.

This area came into being as a place on the map when Jason L. Rector, known as the town’s founder, established a mesquite wood terminal on a Southern Pacific Railroad siding from where lumber was hauled to market in Los Angeles. This spur or siding was named “Woodspur” and did a thriving business

he townsite was known as Woodspur for the first three years of its existence. Mr. Rector relinquished this work and carried into execution a long cherished plan of surveying the valley. His next step was to put down a well to test the idea that an abundance of water was available for irrigation.

Settlement in the area did not begin until Rector, aided by his brother Lon B. Rector, had a well dug on the raw desert four miles east of Indio. This first well tapped a fine pure artesian water well (on what is now covered by the intersection of Grapefruit Avenue and Fifth Street in Coachella), which descended 550 feet and took eight months to dig. The Rectors completed the well in November of 1900

he Rectors then set about laying a townsite on land owned by J. L. Rector. In this they had the help of C. E. Mawby and the backing of the Requa interests. A name had to be selected for the future town, and the suggestion was made that it be called Rector. However, Mr. Rector declined the honor and proposed the name of “Conchilla,” from the Spanish meaning of little shells, or “Land of the Little Shells” named for all of the little shells found in the area.

This name was agreed upon. The developers formally laid out the townsite in January 1901, and sent a prospectus to the printers, which was to announce the opening of the new town and the tremendous agricultural possibilities in the surrounding area. But the printers returned the prospectus with Conchilla spelled Coachella (misreading the letter “n” for an “a” and misreading the “i” as an “e”). Rather than delay their announcement, Mr. Rector and the others decided to accept the name, which was also adopted by the Valley.

When it was found out that Mr. Rector had struck water in that arid region, many men came from various places to inspect the result. Before him, large amounts of money had been expanded by several persons interested in the development of the section, but without success. By the well-directed efforts of Mr. Rector, irrigation was made possible and sturdy citizens were located on homesteads to which the prior rights had been forfeited by previous settlers, who on account of being unable to get water, had abandoned their claims.

Coachella remained a town until incorporation on December 13, 1946, after residents voted by a 5-1 majority to form a city. Coachella first began as 2.5-square-miles. The area of land between what is now First through Ninth Streets were then called Fourth North and Fourth South

The Best Employment Lawyers in Coachella

Coachella is home to a wide array of legal professionals, presenting residents with numerous options for legal representation. In this bustling city, you’ll find countless lawyers and law firms vying to provide their services to the local community. However, in today’s digital age, the process of finding the right attorney can be further complicated by the deluge of online advertisements, radio promotions, and billboard endorsements that besiege individuals seeking legal assistance.

When individuals in Coachella confront significant legal issues, especially those involving employment law, the challenge lies in discerning which attorney is the most suitable choice. An online search for “Coachella employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in Coachella” often yields a plethora of paid advertisements, making it challenging for individuals to differentiate between attorneys and assess their expertise.

At the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., we recognize the paramount importance of providing top-notch legal representation to our clients. Each of our attorneys brings nearly two decades of experience to the table, demonstrating a robust track record of success in advocating for the rights of both employers and employees. Our firm’s unwavering commitment revolves around delivering exceptional legal services that prioritize quality over quantity.

In contrast to some law firms that heavily invest in marketing gimmicks, our attorneys prefer to invest their time in the courtroom, passionately fighting for our clients’ rights. We invite you to inquire about our performance through client references, or you can explore the abundance of positive reviews available online. With offices located in Riverside, Orange, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is conveniently situated near Coachella.

Our employment lawyers are poised to offer world-class services and top-tier representation to the residents of Coachella. When facing complex legal matters, you can trust us to provide the seasoned and experienced counsel necessary to navigate your case successfully..

We Can Help Coachella Residents With:

Featured Employment Case

Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Breeden, 532 U.S. 268 (2001)
Clark County School District v. Breeden was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with a Title VII retaliation claim. The key facts of the case are as follows: Patricia Breeden, an employee of the Clark County School District in Nevada, filed a complaint of sex discrimination against the school district. The complaint was based on a comment made during a staff meeting. The school district subsequently transferred Breeden to a different position, which she claimed was a form of retaliation for her discrimination complaint. Breeden sued the school district, alleging that the transfer was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits retaliation against employees for opposing employment practices that are discriminatory. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the school district’s actions constituted unlawful retaliation under Title VII. In this case, the Supreme Court found that the transfer did not constitute actionable retaliation under Title VII. The Court reasoned that a reasonable employee would not have felt deterred from making a discrimination complaint based on the school district’s actions. The comment made at the staff meeting did not rise to the level of unlawful discrimination, and the transfer was not shown to be in direct response to her complaint. Ultimately, the Court’s decision in Clark County School District v. Breeden emphasized that for a retaliation claim to succeed under Title VII, there must be a genuine causal connection between the protected activity (opposing discriminatory practices) and the adverse employment action taken by the employer. This case is often cited in the context of employment law and Title VII retaliation claims to establish the standard for evaluating whether a particular action qualifies as unlawful retaliation.

 Avvo Rating 10 Superb


Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision