Bellflower Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of Bellflower, regardless of whether they are employees or employers.  If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.

Bellflower, California

Bellflower is city located in southeast Los Angeles.  Bellflower covers only six square miles but is home to roughly 70,000 residents.  Bellflower lies within zip code 90706 and 90707.

The original title to the Bellflower area dates back to 1784 with one of the first Spanish land grants in California. The Bellflower area was a hunting and fishing spot due to an abundance of wild game, ducks and geese, carp and perch. The area was also used for cattle and grazing dairy cows but settlers moved away. Willow, bamboo, and underbrush, wild grape, blackberry, and rose bushes were grown along the river the name of The Willows and The Wilderness.

In 1906, F.E. Woodruff, a local real estate investor, founded the first municipality on the site, which was named Somerset in 1909 when a post office was established there. However, the proponents of the name ‘Bellflower’ claimed that the US Post Office Department rejected the name ‘Somerset’ to prevent confusion with Somerset, Colorado. The present name is derived from the bellflower apple, which was grown in local orchards during the early 1900s.

Originally settled by dairy farmers of Dutch, Japanese, and Portuguese descent, Bellflower and neighboring Paramount served first as the apple and later the milk production centers for Southern California, until soaring post-World War II property values forced most of the farmers to move several miles east to the Dairy Valley/Dairyland/Dairy City area. These farms were in turn converted into large housing subdivisions for Los Angeles’s growing population that worked in the region’s skilled industrial and service sectors. As a result, amongst the highly diverse backgrounds in Bellflower, there remains today a notable number of residents of Dutch descent; Bellflower is one of the only cities in the US to boast multiple Dutch grocery stores.

After Bellflower was incorporated in 1957, its gradual metamorphosis from agricultural center to residential suburb continued. From the 1950s through the late 1960s, Bellflower Boulevard, the city’s main thoroughfare, was a thriving commercial strip for shopping. Numerous retail and franchise restaurant firms began on this street, which also featured middle- and high-end boutiques, arts and crafts shops, and other small shopkeeps alongside larger department stores and banks. Today, Bellflower is an urban community within greater Southeast Los Angeles.

With offices in Burbank, Orange, and Riverside the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Bellflower. Our employment lawyers stand ready to provide world-class services and top-notch representation to the residents of Bellflower.

Are You Trying To Find the Best Employment Lawyer in Bellflower?  Look No Further

Bellflower stands as a thriving community, brimming with a multitude of legal professionals for its residents to consider. Initiating an online search for “employment lawyer Bellflower” or “wrongful termination attorney Bellflower” typically inundates users with paid advertisements from employment lawyers hailing from various locations. Identifying the right attorney equipped with the essential skills and experience can prove challenging when relying solely on internet advertisements.

For individuals seeking legal representation, evaluating an attorney’s proficiency in handling employment trials and litigation can be a formidable task when their primary reference point is an advertisement. However, at the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., each attorney brings nearly two decades of invaluable experience to the forefront. Our legal team boasts an illustrious track record of success, having effectively represented both employees and employers alike.

Our firm’s core ethos centers on prioritizing quality over quantity. Instead of heavily investing in extensive advertising campaigns, our attorneys are committed to dedicating their time to the courtroom, passionately advocating for our clients’ rights. We understand that actions speak louder than words and wholeheartedly welcome the opportunity to provide references from contented clients upon request. Furthermore, you can peruse our online reviews to gain added assurance in our capabilities.

With conveniently located offices just minutes away from Bellflower, we are poised and prepared to deliver top-notch legal representation to the residents of Bellflower, ensuring that their legal needs are met with the utmost level of expertise and professionalism.

We Are Prepared to Vigorously Represent Bellflower Residents In Cases Involving:

Featured Article:

My Employer Did Not Renew My Contract. Can I Sue for Wrongful Termination?

Navigating the legal intricacies of employment relationships can be complex, especially when it comes to the expiration and non-renewal of employment contracts. In this blog post, we'll delve into the legal concept of Tameny claims and examine how the courts have addressed public policy tort claims based on an employer's refusal to renew an employment contract after its expiration. Tameny Claims and Wrongful Termination: 1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980) Tameny claims originate from the landmark California case Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. This decision established that employees may have a cause of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy when their employment is terminated for reasons that contravene fundamental public policy. 2. Public Policy as Basis for Tameny Claims Tameny claims typically arise when an employer's actions violate public policy principles. Courts have generally not allowed a public policy tort claim based upon the employer's refusal to renew an employment contract after its expiration. Tameny Claims and Non-Renewal of Contracts: 1. Daly v. Exxon Corp. (1997) In the case of Daly v. Exxon Corp., the court held that a public policy tort claim, under Tameny, cannot be sustained based solely on an employer's decision not to renew an employment contract after its expiration. The court emphasized the importance of distinguishing between termination decisions and the expiration of fixed-term contracts. 2. Touchstone Television Productions v. Sup.Ct. (Sheridan) (2012) Touchstone Television Productions reinforced the notion that a cause of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy is not applicable when an employer chooses not to exercise an option to renew a contract. The court highlighted the contractual nature of employment agreements and the limited scope of Tameny claims in the context of contract non-renewals. 3. DeCambre v. Rady Children's Hosp.– San Diego (2015) DeCambre v. Rady Children's Hospital further emphasized the courts' stance, stating that a wrongful termination claim could not proceed when the decision not to renew a doctor's contract was rooted in protected medical peer review proceedings covered by the anti-SLAPP statute. Summarizing the Issue While Tameny claims have been instrumental in protecting employees from wrongful termination, the courts have established clear boundaries when it comes to non-renewal of employment contracts. Understanding the contractual nature of employment relationships and the legal perspectives on contract non-renewals is vital for employees seeking to navigate the complexities of wrongful termination claims in the context of fixed-term agreements. With offices in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino, Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. serves clients across Southern California. Our testimonials and case results speak to our experience and determination to uphold the law. If you are involved in a dispute involving the termination or non-renewal of a contract, our experienced employment lawyers stand ready to help. Visit us to learn more about wrongful termination cases. Let our experienced lawyers guide you through complex employment issues.

 Avvo Rating 10 Superb

   

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision