Bellflower Employment Attorneys
The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of Bellflower, regardless of whether they are employees or employers. If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.
Bellflower, California
Bellflower is city located in southeast Los Angeles. Bellflower covers only six square miles but is home to roughly 70,000 residents. Bellflower lies within zip code 90706 and 90707.
The original title to the Bellflower area dates back to 1784 with one of the first Spanish land grants in California. The Bellflower area was a hunting and fishing spot due to an abundance of wild game, ducks and geese, carp and perch. The area was also used for cattle and grazing dairy cows but settlers moved away. Willow, bamboo, and underbrush, wild grape, blackberry, and rose bushes were grown along the river the name of The Willows and The Wilderness.
In 1906, F.E. Woodruff, a local real estate investor, founded the first municipality on the site, which was named Somerset in 1909 when a post office was established there. However, the proponents of the name ‘Bellflower’ claimed that the US Post Office Department rejected the name ‘Somerset’ to prevent confusion with Somerset, Colorado. The present name is derived from the bellflower apple, which was grown in local orchards during the early 1900s.
Originally settled by dairy farmers of Dutch, Japanese, and Portuguese descent, Bellflower and neighboring Paramount served first as the apple and later the milk production centers for Southern California, until soaring post-World War II property values forced most of the farmers to move several miles east to the Dairy Valley/Dairyland/Dairy City area. These farms were in turn converted into large housing subdivisions for Los Angeles’s growing population that worked in the region’s skilled industrial and service sectors. As a result, amongst the highly diverse backgrounds in Bellflower, there remains today a notable number of residents of Dutch descent; Bellflower is one of the only cities in the US to boast multiple Dutch grocery stores.
After Bellflower was incorporated in 1957, its gradual metamorphosis from agricultural center to residential suburb continued. From the 1950s through the late 1960s, Bellflower Boulevard, the city’s main thoroughfare, was a thriving commercial strip for shopping. Numerous retail and franchise restaurant firms began on this street, which also featured middle- and high-end boutiques, arts and crafts shops, and other small shopkeeps alongside larger department stores and banks. Today, Bellflower is an urban community within greater Southeast Los Angeles.
With offices in Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Oxnard, Temecula, Rancho Cucamonga, Costa Mesa, Culver City, and San Diego the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Bellflower. Our employment lawyers stand ready to provide world-class services and top-notch representation to the residents of Bellflower.
Are You Trying To Find the Best Employment Lawyer in Bellflower? Look No Further
Bellflower stands as a thriving community, brimming with a multitude of legal professionals for its residents to consider. Initiating an online search for “employment lawyer Bellflower” or “wrongful termination attorney Bellflower” typically inundates users with paid advertisements from employment lawyers hailing from various locations. Identifying the right attorney equipped with the essential skills and experience can prove challenging when relying solely on internet advertisements.
For individuals seeking legal representation, evaluating an attorney’s proficiency in handling employment trials and litigation can be a formidable task when their primary reference point is an advertisement. However, at the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., each attorney brings nearly two decades of invaluable experience to the forefront. Our legal team boasts an illustrious track record of success, having effectively represented both employees and employers alike.
Our firm’s core ethos centers on prioritizing quality over quantity. Instead of heavily investing in extensive advertising campaigns, our attorneys are committed to dedicating their time to the courtroom, passionately advocating for our clients’ rights. We understand that actions speak louder than words and wholeheartedly welcome the opportunity to provide references from contented clients upon request. Furthermore, you can peruse our online reviews to gain added assurance in our capabilities.
With conveniently located offices just minutes away from Bellflower, we are poised and prepared to deliver top-notch legal representation to the residents of Bellflower, ensuring that their legal needs are met with the utmost level of expertise and professionalism.
We Are Prepared to Vigorously Represent Bellflower Residents In Cases Involving:
Featured Article:
Wrongful Termination vs. Lawful Discharge After Bodily Injury in California
📌 Key Takeaways Find out whether a post-injury firing crossed the line by focusing on motive, process, and what the law actually protects. FEHA Sets the Guardrails: California law forbids disability discrimination in private-sector employment (Gov. Code §12940(a)) and often provides broader protection than the ADA. Process Is Evidence: Employers have duties to consider reasonable accommodation and engage in a good-faith interactive process (§§12940(m), (n)), and skipping these steps is a red flag. Timing Alone Is Not Conclusive: Temporal proximity between injury disclosure and termination can be important, but outcomes turn on the totality of circumstances—not a single date on the calendar. Lawful Reasons Are Narrow: A discharge can be lawful when it stems from bona fide business reasons, a genuine undue hardship, or the inability to perform essential functions even with accommodation. Think Before You Quit: Constructive-discharge claims carry a high threshold, and resigning can negatively affect income and legal posture. Clarity comes from understanding the protections, recognizing warning signs, and distinguishing legitimate business decisions from disability-based motives. This guide is for Southern California blue-collar employees in ongoing private-sector roles who were let go after an injury and want a clear, non-jargon framework to spot potential FEHA problems. A termination that follows a bodily injury may be wrongful under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) when the decision involves disability discrimination (Gov. Code § 12940(a)), failure to provide reasonable accommodation (§ 12940(m)), failure to engage in the interactive process (§ 12940(n)), or retaliation for protected activity (§ 12940(h)). A discharge may be lawful when the reason is genuinely unrelated to disability, when the employee cannot perform the essential functions of the job even with reasonable accommodation, or when a requested accommodation would create an undue hardship. Determining where a particular termination falls along this spectrum requires professional legal analysis. California defines physical disability broadly, including injuries that limit major life activities (Gov. Code § 12926.1(c)). FEHA prohibits disability discrimination in private-sector employment (§ 12940(a)) and imposes an affirmative duty on employers to consider reasonable accommodation (§ 12940(m)) through a good-faith, interactive process (§ 12940(n)). Retaliation for requesting accommodation or communicating disability-related work restrictions is prohibited (§ 12940(h)). California’s at-will presumption (Lab. Code § 2922) does not permit termination for reasons that conflict with these protections. Federal ADA provisions (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.) run in parallel, while FEHA often provides broader coverage Key Ideas to Keep in Mind When a worker is fired after a bodily injury, the analysis usually focuses on the employer’s motivation, the steps the employer did or did not take, and how disability-related issues were handled. First, FEHA sets important guardrails for employers. California law forbids disability discrimination in private-sector employment and often provides broader protection than federal law. Second, the way an employer handles reasonable accommodation is often powerful evidence. Employers are expected to consider reasonable accommodations and to engage in a good-faith interactive process with the employee. When an employer skips this process altogether, that choice can be a red... Read more
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results