Bellflower Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for the rights of the residents of Bellflower, regardless of whether they are employees or employers.  If your cause is just and involves employment law, give us a call to see how we can help.

Bellflower, California

Bellflower is city located in southeast Los Angeles.  Bellflower covers only six square miles but is home to roughly 70,000 residents.  Bellflower lies within zip code 90706 and 90707.

The original title to the Bellflower area dates back to 1784 with one of the first Spanish land grants in California. The Bellflower area was a hunting and fishing spot due to an abundance of wild game, ducks and geese, carp and perch. The area was also used for cattle and grazing dairy cows but settlers moved away. Willow, bamboo, and underbrush, wild grape, blackberry, and rose bushes were grown along the river the name of The Willows and The Wilderness.

In 1906, F.E. Woodruff, a local real estate investor, founded the first municipality on the site, which was named Somerset in 1909 when a post office was established there. However, the proponents of the name ‘Bellflower’ claimed that the US Post Office Department rejected the name ‘Somerset’ to prevent confusion with Somerset, Colorado. The present name is derived from the bellflower apple, which was grown in local orchards during the early 1900s.

Originally settled by dairy farmers of Dutch, Japanese, and Portuguese descent, Bellflower and neighboring Paramount served first as the apple and later the milk production centers for Southern California, until soaring post-World War II property values forced most of the farmers to move several miles east to the Dairy Valley/Dairyland/Dairy City area. These farms were in turn converted into large housing subdivisions for Los Angeles’s growing population that worked in the region’s skilled industrial and service sectors. As a result, amongst the highly diverse backgrounds in Bellflower, there remains today a notable number of residents of Dutch descent; Bellflower is one of the only cities in the US to boast multiple Dutch grocery stores.

After Bellflower was incorporated in 1957, its gradual metamorphosis from agricultural center to residential suburb continued. From the 1950s through the late 1960s, Bellflower Boulevard, the city’s main thoroughfare, was a thriving commercial strip for shopping. Numerous retail and franchise restaurant firms began on this street, which also featured middle- and high-end boutiques, arts and crafts shops, and other small shopkeeps alongside larger department stores and banks. Today, Bellflower is an urban community within greater Southeast Los Angeles.

With offices in Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Oxnard, Temecula, Rancho Cucamonga, Costa Mesa, Culver City, and San Diego the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Bellflower. Our employment lawyers stand ready to provide world-class services and top-notch representation to the residents of Bellflower.

Are You Trying To Find the Best Employment Lawyer in Bellflower?  Look No Further

Bellflower stands as a thriving community, brimming with a multitude of legal professionals for its residents to consider. Initiating an online search for “employment lawyer Bellflower” or “wrongful termination attorney Bellflower” typically inundates users with paid advertisements from employment lawyers hailing from various locations. Identifying the right attorney equipped with the essential skills and experience can prove challenging when relying solely on internet advertisements.

For individuals seeking legal representation, evaluating an attorney’s proficiency in handling employment trials and litigation can be a formidable task when their primary reference point is an advertisement. However, at the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., each attorney brings nearly two decades of invaluable experience to the forefront. Our legal team boasts an illustrious track record of success, having effectively represented both employees and employers alike.

Our firm’s core ethos centers on prioritizing quality over quantity. Instead of heavily investing in extensive advertising campaigns, our attorneys are committed to dedicating their time to the courtroom, passionately advocating for our clients’ rights. We understand that actions speak louder than words and wholeheartedly welcome the opportunity to provide references from contented clients upon request. Furthermore, you can peruse our online reviews to gain added assurance in our capabilities.

With conveniently located offices just minutes away from Bellflower, we are poised and prepared to deliver top-notch legal representation to the residents of Bellflower, ensuring that their legal needs are met with the utmost level of expertise and professionalism.

We Are Prepared to Vigorously Represent Bellflower Residents In Cases Involving:

Featured Article:

  • wrongful termination

Wrongful Termination Due to Back Injury in California: Recognizing Potential FEHA and ADA Violations

📌 Key Takeaways When your livelihood is on the line, understanding how the law protects you is the first step toward safeguarding your rights. Know the Statutory Protections: California’s FEHA and the federal ADA prohibit disability-based terminations and require reasonable accommodations for qualified employees. Recognize Employer Obligations: Covered employers must engage in a statutorily mandated interactive process to assess and provide appropriate accommodations. Spot Red Flags Early: Sudden termination after disclosing a back injury or requesting accommodations may indicate potential statutory non-compliance. Industry Patterns Matter: Physically demanding sectors such as construction, healthcare, and manufacturing have documented histories of FEHA and ADA violations. Professional Guidance is Essential: Qualified legal counsel can evaluate specific facts, confirm statutory coverage, and determine potential claims. Knowing the legal framework empowers you to identify when your workplace rights may be at risk. In California, wrongful termination due to a back injury may indicate non-compliance with two complementary statutory frameworks—the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code § 12940) and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—when an employer takes an adverse employment action that may be motivated by disability, denies reasonable accommodation, or fails to engage in the statutorily mandated interactive process. Recognition of these potential statutory violations depends on identifying the timing, context, and nature of the employment action in relation to disability status and essential job functions. Laws are subject to change; consult official statutory sources for current language. Statutory Coverage: Recognition, Not Procedure FEHA and the ADA operate together to prohibit discrimination against a qualified individual with a disability and to require reasonable accommodation to enable performance of essential job functions. Both statutes require a good-faith interactive process between employer and employee. When termination occurs soon after disclosure of a back injury or an accommodation request, the temporal proximity may be a factor suggesting possible non-compliance. Potential Recognition Cues in Back-Injury Contexts Indicators that may suggest a statutory violation include: Accommodation denial without individualized assessment: Employer rejects assistive devices, modified duties, or adjusted schedules without evaluating whether these changes would address limitations while maintaining essential functions. Failure to participate in the interactive process: No substantive dialogue or exploration of alternatives after disclosure of limitations. Adverse action closely following disclosure or request: Termination, demotion, or reduction in hours occurring shortly after a back-injury accommodation request. Inconsistent explanations that may suggest pretext: Shifting or conflicting reasons for termination when compared with prior performance records or treatment of similarly situated employees (comparators). Note: These are illustrative examples only and do not determine whether a legal violation exists. Lawful vs. Potentially Unlawful Conduct at a High Level Potentially compliant conduct may include: Temporary restructuring of marginal duties after mutual discussion about essential functions. Time-limited light duty supported by documented operational needs. Application of neutral attendance rules following accommodation discussions. Potentially non-compliant conduct may include: Blanket refusals to consider modifications. Termination immediately after receiving medical restrictions. Statements indicating reluctance to employ individuals with lifting limitations. Note: These distinctions are educational only and not a... Read more

Avvo Rating 10 Superb

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$400 ThousandEmployment: Constructive Termination
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$210 ThousandEmployment: Family Leave Retaliation
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$165 ThousandEmployment: Wage & Hour Violations
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Associational Disability Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision