Banning Employment Attorneys
The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for both employers and employees in Banning, California.
Banning, California
Banning is a city located in Riverside County. Banning is home to roughly 30,000 residents. It covers approximately twenty three square miles, and encompasses the following zip code: 92220. The City of Banning is situated in the San Gorgonio Pass and has always been a strong location for economic development dating back to the days of the gold rush. By 1824, the San Gabriel Mission Fathers established a branch of the Mission at the highest point in the Pass, along the foothills northwest of Banning, where they raised cattle, sheep and pursued land cultivation. By that time, the area was known as Rancho San Gorgonio, so named by the padres after Street Gorgonio, A Latin martyr. The first white man to reach the area was Dr. Isaac Smith in 1853 who, according to recorded land documents, purchased from Paulino Weaver an undivided 1-third interest from the Mexican Governor, Pio Pico. Dr. Smith brought his wife and 7 children to the rancho to live and built a house known as Smith’s Station, which later became Highland Home and subsequently called Highland Springs. The following year, Banning’s first permanent landmark, Gilman Ranch adobe, was built. It was ultimately used as a stage stop by the Colorado Stage & Express Line founded by Alexander & Co. of Los Angeles on its route to the Colorado River in 1862, where gold had been discovered. Gilman’s Ranch just north of downtown Banning served as a station for the stagecoach lines that were headed to the gold boomtowns. Later, the railroad became a major contributor to the area’s growth. The town of Banning was incorporated on February 6, 1913 and was named after Phineas Banning, a stagecoach line owner and the “Father of the Port of Los Angeles.” Between 1930 and 1940 a new economic development emerged. The Metropolitan Water District planned to build an Aqueduct system. The plan was to drill a 26 foot in diameter hole through a13 mile section of the San Jacinto Mountains. Beginning in Cabazon and exit below Gilman Hot Springs. This was the largest and most significant engineering project ever to affect the San Gorgonio Pass area and led to a massive boom in commerce and the local economy. Subsequently, between 1940 and 1960 Banning’s population tripled in size. Today, the City is committed to a growing Banning, and maintains a business-friendly approach to economic development.
The Best Employment Lawyers in Banning
Banning, with its strategic location, offers its residents an array of choices when it comes to legal services. The legal landscape here is teeming with numerous lawyers and law firms, each vying for attention and clients. In fact, some legal practitioners might go to great lengths, even breaking down your door just to make a sales pitch. However, for both employers and employees in Banning facing serious legal issues, particularly those involving employment law, the challenge lies in discerning which lawyer is the right fit for their needs. This task can be further complicated by the constant barrage of gimmicky radio ads and the sight of cheesy posters plastered on billboards, buses, and street benches. While many individuals turn to the internet for guidance, even an online search for “Banning employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in Banning” often yields results inundated with paid advertisements from billboard lawyers. It’s essential to recognize that while a billboard lawyer may be suitable for certain cases, there are instances that demand the highest caliber of quality representation, provided by seasoned legal professionals. At the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., each of our attorneys boasts nearly two decades of experience. They have built a solid track record of success in advocating for the rights and interests of both employers and employees. Our firm’s ethos centers on quality, emphasizing the meticulous representation of our clients rather than the pursuit of quantity. Our lawyers are more inclined to spend their time in the courtroom, fiercely fighting for the rights of our clients, rather than recording catchy radio advertisements in a studio. We don’t expect you to take our word for it; we’re more than willing to provide client references upon your request. Moreover, you can peruse our online reviews to gain insight into our clients’ experiences. With offices strategically located in Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Orange, Oxnard, Riverside, and San Bernardino, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Banning. Our employment lawyers are primed and prepared to deliver world-class legal services and top-notch representation to the residents of Banning. When you need seasoned professionals who will champion your cause with dedication and expertise, we stand ready to serve you.
We Can Help Banning Residents With:
Featured Article:
Physical Sexual Harassment in The Everyday Workplace: When Touching Goes Too Far
Key Takeaways: Physical Sexual Harassment in Industrial Settings: California law recognizes unwanted touching that creates a hostile work environment as harassment, even in industrial settings where some physical contact may be unavoidable. Examples include deliberate brushing against someone's body, unwanted massaging, or blocking movement in tight spaces. Legal Protections Available: California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) provides significant workplace harassment protections regardless of gender, industry type, or company size. The Civil Rights Department enforces these laws, which include anti-retaliation provisions. Documentation and Reporting Options: Workers may consider documenting incidents through personal notes, witness information, and saved communications. Reporting channels include internal company procedures, the California Civil Rights Department, and the federal EEOC, with a three-year filing period for administrative complaints. Small Company Considerations: Even in companies without formal HR departments, California's anti-harassment laws apply, and workers may report directly to state agencies when internal reporting isn't viable. Understanding these protections can help workers navigate harassment situations while preserving their safety and dignity at work. In California's industrial workspace, physical interactions are often part of daily operations. However, when touching crosses certain boundaries, legal protections may apply for workers regardless of their industry. The difference between normal physical contact and harassment is an important distinction under California law. Defining Physical Sexual Harassment in an Industrial Setting California law recognizes two primary categories of workplace sexual harassment: quid pro quo harassment (when sexual demands are tied to employment benefits) and hostile work environment harassment. Physical sexual harassment can fall into either one of these categories and often involves unwanted physical touching which creates an intimidating, offensive, or hostile atmosphere on the basis of sex. Examples of physical sexual harassment in the workplace may include, but are not limited to: Deliberate brushing up against someone's body Unwanted massaging or touching of shoulders, back, or other body parts Blocking someone's movement in tight spaces like warehouses or construction sites Forced hugging or other unwanted physical contact Any touching that feels sexual in nature or creates discomfort Even in a work environment where some physical contact may be unavoidable due to space constraints or safety protocols, the law distinguishes between necessary workplace interactions and harassment. Important factors involve whether the contact is unwelcome, if it is sexual in nature, and if it is severe or pervasive enough to alter working conditions. [ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE] In a manufacturing facility, occasional incidental contact might occur when workers navigate narrow aisles between machinery. However, if a coworker repeatedly brushes against another person's body when plenty of space exists to avoid contact, or if the touching appears deliberate and focused on certain body areas, this pattern might constitute harassment under California law if it creates a hostile environment for the recipient. [END EXAMPLE] +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 💡 Quick Takeaways Context is crucial: Even in space-restricted industrial settings, patterns of unnecessary touching may constitute harassment. Both forms of sexual harassment are equally illegal: California prohibits quid pro quo harassment and hostile work environment harassment involving physical contact. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Legal Rights ... Read more
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results