Banning Employment Attorneys

The trial attorneys of the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stand ready to fight for both employers and employees in Banning, California.

Banning, California

Banning is a city located in Riverside County.  Banning is home to roughly 30,000 residents.  It covers approximately twenty three square miles, and encompasses the following zip code: 92220. The City of Banning is situated in the San Gorgonio Pass and has always been a strong location for economic development dating back to the days of the gold rush. By 1824, the San Gabriel Mission Fathers established a branch of the Mission at the highest point in the Pass, along the foothills northwest of Banning, where they raised cattle, sheep and pursued land cultivation. By that time, the area was known as Rancho San Gorgonio, so named by the padres after Street Gorgonio, A Latin martyr. The first white man to reach the area was Dr. Isaac Smith in 1853 who, according to recorded land documents, purchased from Paulino Weaver an undivided 1-third interest from the Mexican Governor, Pio Pico. Dr. Smith brought his wife and 7 children to the rancho to live and built a house known as Smith’s Station, which later became Highland Home and subsequently called Highland Springs. The following year, Banning’s first permanent landmark, Gilman Ranch adobe, was built. It was ultimately used as a stage stop by the Colorado Stage & Express Line founded by Alexander & Co. of Los Angeles on its route to the Colorado River in 1862, where gold had been discovered. Gilman’s Ranch just north of downtown Banning served as a station for the stagecoach lines that were headed to the gold boomtowns. Later, the railroad became a major contributor to the area’s growth. The town of Banning was incorporated on February 6, 1913 and was named after Phineas Banning, a stagecoach line owner and the “Father of the Port of Los Angeles.” Between 1930 and 1940 a new economic development emerged. The Metropolitan Water District planned to build an Aqueduct system. The plan was to drill a 26 foot in diameter hole through a13 mile section of the San Jacinto Mountains. Beginning in Cabazon and exit below Gilman Hot Springs. This was the largest and most significant engineering project ever to affect the San Gorgonio Pass area and led to a massive boom in commerce and the local economy. Subsequently, between 1940 and 1960 Banning’s population tripled in size. Today, the City is committed to a growing Banning, and maintains a business-friendly approach to economic development.

The Best Employment Lawyers in Banning

Banning, with its strategic location, offers its residents an array of choices when it comes to legal services. The legal landscape here is teeming with numerous lawyers and law firms, each vying for attention and clients. In fact, some legal practitioners might go to great lengths, even breaking down your door just to make a sales pitch. However, for both employers and employees in Banning facing serious legal issues, particularly those involving employment law, the challenge lies in discerning which lawyer is the right fit for their needs. This task can be further complicated by the constant barrage of gimmicky radio ads and the sight of cheesy posters plastered on billboards, buses, and street benches. While many individuals turn to the internet for guidance, even an online search for “Banning employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in Banning” often yields results inundated with paid advertisements from billboard lawyers. It’s essential to recognize that while a billboard lawyer may be suitable for certain cases, there are instances that demand the highest caliber of quality representation, provided by seasoned legal professionals.  At the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., each of our attorneys boasts nearly two decades of experience. They have built a solid track record of success in advocating for the rights and interests of both employers and employees. Our firm’s ethos centers on quality, emphasizing the meticulous representation of our clients rather than the pursuit of quantity. Our lawyers are more inclined to spend their time in the courtroom, fiercely fighting for the rights of our clients, rather than recording catchy radio advertisements in a studio. We don’t expect you to take our word for it; we’re more than willing to provide client references upon your request. Moreover, you can peruse our online reviews to gain insight into our clients’ experiences.  With offices strategically located in Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Oxnard, Temecula, Rancho Cucamonga, Costa Mesa, Culver City, and San Diego, the Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is just minutes away from Banning. Our employment lawyers are primed and prepared to deliver world-class legal services and top-notch representation to the residents of Banning. When you need seasoned professionals who will champion your cause with dedication and expertise, we stand ready to serve you.

We Can Help Banning Residents With:

Featured Article:

  • employment law attorney

Wrongful Termination vs. Lawful Discharge: Identifying Illegal Firing After Back Injury in California

📌 Key Takeaways Facing termination after a back injury demands clarity on what is lawful and what may violate California’s protections. Recognize Statutory Red Flags: Termination tied closely to a back injury disclosure may violate FEHA provisions prohibiting disability-based discharge, failure to accommodate, or refusal to engage in the interactive process. Distinguish Legitimate from Illegal Termination: A lawful discharge is supported by documented, pre-existing performance issues or proven undue hardship, not sudden adverse actions post-injury disclosure. Spot Interactive Process Failures: Ignoring accommodation requests, refusing discussions, or rejecting alternatives without undue hardship justification can breach California Code of Regulations § 11068. Identify Improper Accommodation Denials: Blanket rejections without individualized assessment or failure to consider reassignment to a vacant position can violate Government Code § 12926(p). Act Within Legal Timeframes: Deadlines for taking action can be short, making early consultation with a qualified employment attorney critical. Clear statutory alignment and prompt legal guidance protect your rights after a back injury. Employment laws are subject to change and may have exceptions. Excerpts provided below are current as of 2025. Consultation with a qualified employment law attorney is essential for case-specific guidance. 1. Identifying Concrete FEHA Violations in Back Injury Cases Indicators of Potential Violation: Termination soon after disclosing a back injury. Documented refusal by the employer to engage in the interactive process. Written denial of reasonable accommodation requests. Sudden, negative performance reviews post-disclosure. Relevant Statutory Language: California Government Code § 12940(a): “It is an unlawful employment practice… [f]or an employer, because of the… physical disability… of any person, to… discharge the person from employment.” California Government Code § 12940(k): “It is an unlawful employment practice… [f]or an employer… to fail to make reasonable accommodation for the known physical… disability of an applicant or employee.” California Government Code § 12940(m): “It is an unlawful employment practice… [f]or an employer… to fail to engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process with the employee… to determine effective reasonable accommodations.” 2. Distinguishing Lawful from Unlawful Termination Under California Law Lawful Terminations May Involve: Legitimate business reasons unrelated to disability. Documented performance issues predating injury disclosure. Demonstrated undue hardship consistent with statutory standards. Potentially Unlawful Terminations May Involve: Adverse employment action closely following back injury disclosure without legitimate, documented justification. Refusal to consider accommodations before termination. 3. Recognizing Interactive Process Failures Indicators: Employer ignores written accommodation requests. Employer refuses to discuss possible adjustments. Alternative accommodation suggestions dismissed without analysis of hardship. Relevant Statutory Language: California Code of Regulations, Title 2, § 11068(a): “It is unlawful for an employer… to fail to engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process with the employee… to determine effective reasonable accommodations.” 4. Common Patterns in Reasonable Accommodation Denials Indicators: Blanket denials without individualized assessment. Employer fails to evaluate possible job restructuring. No effort to explore reassignment to a vacant position. Relevant Statutory Language: California Government Code § 12926(p): “‘Reasonable accommodation’ may include… job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, acquisition or modification of equipment or... Read more

Avvo Rating 10 Superb

Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients

Check Out Our Case Results

$6.131 MillionEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$3.85 MillionEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$950 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$800 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$750 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$700 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$658 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$650 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$400 ThousandEmployment: Constructive Termination
$375 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$325 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$300 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination / Race Discrimination
$295 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$265 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$250 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$250 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$250 ThousandEmployment Law: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$240 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$210 ThousandEmployment: Family Leave Retaliation
$200 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$199 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$195 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$193 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$180 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$175 ThousandEmployment: Pregnancy Discrimination
$175 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$175 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$174 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$167 ThousandEmployment: Wage and Hour
$165 ThousandEmployment: Wage & Hour Violations
$160 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Wages
$158 ThousandBreach of Contract
$150 ThousandEmployment: Reverse Race Discrimination
$130 ThousandEmployment: Race Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Sexual Harassment
$125 ThousandEmployment: Disability Discrimination
$125 ThousandEmployment: Medical Leave Retaliation
$120 ThousandEmployment: Unpaid Commission Wages
$120 ThousandEmployment: Retaliation
$120 ThousandPersonal Injury: Automobile Collision
$107 ThousandEmployment: Whistleblower Retaliation
$100 ThousandEmployment: Associational Disability Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Religious Discrimination
$100 ThousandEmployment: Failure to Accommodate
$100 ThousandEmployment: Wrongful Termination
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Bicycle Collision
$100 ThousandPersonal Injury: Pedestrian Collision