Altadena Employment Lawyers
The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stands ready to fight for the rights of workers in Altadena who experience discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, or other illegal conduct in the workplace. The firm also stands ready to provide small businesses in Altadena economical and efficient solutions to problems involving employment law. Our substantial experience in approaching employment disputes from both sides gives us rare insight into the mindset of the opponent, which truly goes a long way to achieving the best possible outcome.
Altadena, California
Altadena is situated in the Verdugo Mountains region of Los Angeles County. The name Altadena derives from the Spanish alta, meaning “upper”, and dena from Pasadena; the area is adjacent to, but at a higher elevation than, Pasadena. Throughout its history and up until today, as Altadena celebrates its 125th year, this distinct geography has nurtured an independent spirit and given the community a close-to-nature feel. Citizens here have consistently resisted annexation to Pasadena (although that city has taken 46 “bites” of it over the years, seeking tax revenues), and voted down incorporating as a city. Altadenans prefer a looser political structure that still manages to foster an unmistakable identity. Between the1890s through the 1920’s, ranchers and residents continued slowly buying up Altadena land, growing grapes, and expanding into oranges, olives, walnuts — and in the early 20th century, dates, avocados, and commercial fruit and ornamental plant nurseries. Business magnates also came, mainly from Chicago and other midwestern cities, attracted by climate, rural ambiance, and the delights of nearby Pasadena. Excellent public transportation lines made jobs in Pasadena and Los Angeles easily accessible. Somehow, Altadena retained its rustic character and rural flavor through the 1930s, when people continued to arrive, and into the 1940s. Economic growth and GI benefits fueled the largest expansion of the middle class in U.S. history following World War II. This included rising rates of home ownership; a huge building boom ate up most of Altadena’s remaining open land and turned it into housing for the newly upwardly mobile. Today Altadena is home to more than 40,000 residents. It covers more than nine square miles and encompasses the following zip codes: 91001, 91003, and 91104. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is headquartered in Los Angeles which is minutes away from Altadena. Thus, our lawyers stand ready to serve employees and employers in Altadena with all their employment law needs.
Looking For The Best Altadena Employment Attorneys? Look No Further
Finding the right labor lawyer in Altadena can be a challenging task. The landscape is filled with various firms, each with their unique approach to handling cases. It’s essential to understand that not every employee attorney in Altadena is a one-size-fits-all solution. Different lawyers may have varying preferences when it comes to resolving employment issues. Some Altadena employment lawyers may lean towards quick and straightforward, low-value settlements, while others are willing to engage in a more extended legal battle to secure a full and just resolution. When you conduct an internet search for “Altadena employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in Altadena,” you’ll likely encounter numerous paid advertisements from lawyers eager to pursue the path of least resistance. At the Akopyan Law Firm our mission is unwavering: we aim to achieve the best possible outcome for each client, regardless of the magnitude of the fight it may entail. To ensure we provide top-notch service, we limit our caseload, allowing us to give every employee who chooses us the attention and dedication they deserve. When you become our client, you become part of our family, and we take pride in the personalized, first-class service we offer. But don’t just take our word for it—see what our clients have to say! The relationships we cultivate with our clients often extend well beyond the conclusion of their cases. Our Altadena employment lawyers approach each case with unwavering passion and dedication, resulting in a track record of excellent results. If you’re in search of employment lawyers in Altadena who will fight tirelessly for your rights, we encourage you to contact us today for a complimentary case evaluation. Your pursuit of justice begins here.
We Can Reprsent Altadena Residents In Employment Litigation Involving:
Featured Article:
Wrongful Termination Due to Back Injury in California: Recognizing Potential FEHA and ADA Violations
📌 Key Takeaways When your livelihood is on the line, understanding how the law protects you is the first step toward safeguarding your rights. Know the Statutory Protections: California’s FEHA and the federal ADA prohibit disability-based terminations and require reasonable accommodations for qualified employees. Recognize Employer Obligations: Covered employers must engage in a statutorily mandated interactive process to assess and provide appropriate accommodations. Spot Red Flags Early: Sudden termination after disclosing a back injury or requesting accommodations may indicate potential statutory non-compliance. Industry Patterns Matter: Physically demanding sectors such as construction, healthcare, and manufacturing have documented histories of FEHA and ADA violations. Professional Guidance is Essential: Qualified legal counsel can evaluate specific facts, confirm statutory coverage, and determine potential claims. Knowing the legal framework empowers you to identify when your workplace rights may be at risk. In California, wrongful termination due to a back injury may indicate non-compliance with two complementary statutory frameworks—the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code § 12940) and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—when an employer takes an adverse employment action that may be motivated by disability, denies reasonable accommodation, or fails to engage in the statutorily mandated interactive process. Recognition of these potential statutory violations depends on identifying the timing, context, and nature of the employment action in relation to disability status and essential job functions. Laws are subject to change; consult official statutory sources for current language. Statutory Coverage: Recognition, Not Procedure FEHA and the ADA operate together to prohibit discrimination against a qualified individual with a disability and to require reasonable accommodation to enable performance of essential job functions. Both statutes require a good-faith interactive process between employer and employee. When termination occurs soon after disclosure of a back injury or an accommodation request, the temporal proximity may be a factor suggesting possible non-compliance. Potential Recognition Cues in Back-Injury Contexts Indicators that may suggest a statutory violation include: Accommodation denial without individualized assessment: Employer rejects assistive devices, modified duties, or adjusted schedules without evaluating whether these changes would address limitations while maintaining essential functions. Failure to participate in the interactive process: No substantive dialogue or exploration of alternatives after disclosure of limitations. Adverse action closely following disclosure or request: Termination, demotion, or reduction in hours occurring shortly after a back-injury accommodation request. Inconsistent explanations that may suggest pretext: Shifting or conflicting reasons for termination when compared with prior performance records or treatment of similarly situated employees (comparators). Note: These are illustrative examples only and do not determine whether a legal violation exists. Lawful vs. Potentially Unlawful Conduct at a High Level Potentially compliant conduct may include: Temporary restructuring of marginal duties after mutual discussion about essential functions. Time-limited light duty supported by documented operational needs. Application of neutral attendance rules following accommodation discussions. Potentially non-compliant conduct may include: Blanket refusals to consider modifications. Termination immediately after receiving medical restrictions. Statements indicating reluctance to employ individuals with lifting limitations. Note: These distinctions are educational only and not a... Read more
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results