East Los Angeles Employment Lawyers
The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. stands ready to fight for the rights of workers in East Los Angeles dealing with discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, or other illegal conduct in the workplace. The firm also stands ready to provide small businesses in East Los Angeles, economical and efficient solutions to problems involving employment law. Our substantial experience in approaching employment disputes from both sides gives us rare insight into the mindset of the opponent, which truly goes a long way to achieving the best possible outcome.
About East Los Angeles, California
East Los Angeles or East L.A., often referred to by locals as “East Los”, is an unincorporated area in Los Angeles County. Historically, when it was founded in 1873, the neighborhood northeast of downtown known today as Lincoln Heights was originally named East Los Angeles, but in 1917 residents voted to change the name to its present name. Today it is considered part of L.A.’s Eastside, the geographic region east of the Los Angeles River that includes three neighborhoods within the city of Los Angeles (Boyle Heights, El Sereno and Lincoln Heights) and the unincorporated community in Los Angeles County known today as “East Los Angeles”. When Lincoln Heights, the first east-side subdivision created in 1873, changed its name in 1917, Belvedere (Belvedere Gardens and Belvedere Heights) and surrounding unincorporated county areas were given the moniker of East Los Angeles. By the 1930s, most maps had started to label the Belvedere area as “East Los Angeles”
By the early 1920s, workers in the sprouting industrial district to the south were seeking nearby housing. At the time, the unincorporated region was undeveloped and or preserved for agriculture and oil extraction. Belvedere township included the territory that in 1902 became the city of Montebello. In 1932 local business leaders gave the name East Los Angeles to Belvedere and adjacent areas (that had been known as Belvedere Gardens, Belvedere Heights, Laguna, etc.) By the onset of World War II, East Los Angeles was a nearly exclusively Latino community, soon reinforced by Mexican workers who arrived to man the machines in the area’s burgeoning war industries. Although the face of the city of Los Angeles and its surrounding communities has changed considerably, East Los Angeles has maintained this basic character throughout the last sixty years. As a result of its history as a long-standing Mexican American community, the area of East Los Angeles continues to be studied and documented by scholars from around the world. East Los Angeles was a significant site during the Chicano Movement. It is not only the single largest Chicano/Mexicano population in the country, but also the largest Hispanic community in the United States. It is also important to note that, although the majority population is mono-cultural, there is a tremendous amount of diversity within the context of that cultural experience, ranging from new immigration from Mexico, migration from other states, and the long-time presence of multi-generational residents dating back to the ranchos.
East Los Angeles is located in central Los Angeles and is home to more than 130,000 residents. It covers approximately seven and a half square miles and encompasses the following zip codes: 90022, 90023, and 90063. The Akopyan Law Firm A.P.C. is headquartered in Los Angeles which is minutes away from East Los Angeles. Thus, our lawyers stand ready to serve employees and employers in East Los Angeles with all their employment law needs.
Your Search For The Best East Los Angeles Employment Attorneys Is Over
Securing the right labor lawyer in East Los Angeles can indeed be a challenging endeavor. The legal landscape here is diverse, with a wide array of firms to choose from, each with its unique approach and philosophy. It’s crucial to understand that not every employee attorney in East Los Angeles will be a suitable match for every case, as preferences and strategies can vary significantly. While some employment lawyers may lean toward swift and simple low-value settlements, others are more inclined to embark on a prolonged and robust legal battle that ultimately leads to a resolution reflecting the full value of the case. An online search for “East Los Angeles employment lawyer” or “wrongful termination attorney in East Los Angeles” often yields a multitude of paid advertisements from lawyers willing to take the easier route. The Akopyan Law Firm stands apart with a resolute commitment to securing the best possible outcome for each client, regardless of the complexity or scale of the challenge. Our dedication to delivering high-quality work on every case leads us to selectively limit our practice, ensuring that every client receives the personalized attention and exceptional representation they deserve. We consider every employee who becomes our client a part of our extended family. While we take great pride in the top-notch, personalized service we provide, we encourage you to explore what our clients have to say and examine our online reviews to witness the satisfaction of our past clients. The relationships we build with our clients often extend beyond the duration of the case itself, emphasizing our commitment to lasting connections. Our East Los Angeles employment lawyers passionately advocate for our clients, as evidenced by the excellent results they’ve achieved. If you’re in search of employment lawyers in East Los Angeles who will fight fervently for your rights and prioritize quality over quantity, we encourage you to reach out to us today for a complimentary case evaluation. Your legal journey begins here, and we’re ready to stand by your side every step of the way.
We Can Help East Los Angeles Residents With:
Featured Article:
Interactive Process Violations in California: Recognizing Possible Employer Violations After Bodily Injuries
📌 Key Takeaways Know the signs of an illegal response when your employer learns about your disabilities due to bodily injuries. Silence Is a Signal: Your employer’s failure to engage in a timely conversation after you disclose a disability can be a direct violation of their legal duty. Good Faith Isn’t Optional: A brief, dismissive meeting or a quick “no” without exploring alternatives fails the legal requirement for a genuine, good-faith dialogue. Policies Don’t Invalidate People: A company's blanket statement like “we don’t offer light duty” is not a valid substitute for an individualized assessment of your specific needs. A Request for an Accommodation Is Protected Activity: Any punitive action, like sudden poor reviews or suspensions following your request for an accommodation for your disability, can be considered illegal retaliation. Recognizing these patterns is the first step in protecting your rights. These insights are for any California employee in a physical role—from construction and warehousing to retail and food service—who needs to understand if their employer is complying with the law after a workplace injury. When an employer in California knows about a physical or other disability, and does not engage in a timely, good-faith interactive process, that conduct may signal a potential violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The most telling markers often include silence after disclosure, perfunctory meetings, an early “no” without exploring options, or adverse treatment following an accommodation request. What the law generally requires—just enough to spot issues Under Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(n), employers generally must engage in an honest, iterative dialogue with an employee who may need reasonable accommodations due to a disability. Interactive process refers to the legally required conversation about potential adjustments; reasonable accommodation means job or workplace changes that may enable performance despite limitations; good faith means a genuine—not superficial—effort to explore feasible options. Common injuries in physical roles—back, shoulder, knee, or leg conditions that limit lifting, reaching, standing, or walking—can qualify as disabilities when they substantially limit major life activities. If the employer knew of a disability and a potential need to provide an accommodation, the duty to engage in the good faith interactive process may be triggered. Red flags that may indicate non-compliance These patterns appear in construction, warehouse/logistics, manufacturing, retail, food service, landscaping, and delivery roles across Southern California. Examples are illustrative and not exhaustive. 1) Complete refusal to engage The disclosure of a disability, and a request for an accommodation is met with no outreach, meeting, or discussion. A written accommodation request receives no response. Blanket statements—“we don’t do light duty,” “this job requires full capacity”—replace individualized dialogue. Termination follows shortly after disclosure without discussion of potential modifications. Industry illustration: A construction employee who cannot lift heavy materials but could perform safety observation, traffic control, or tool management is released without any discussion of how his disability can be accommodated. A warehouse employee returning with a 20-pound lifting limit is told “all roles require 50 pounds,” and no scanning, packing, or dispatch roles... Read more
Millions of Dollars Recovered For Our Clients
Check Out Our Case Results