Sexual harassment, as per California state law, is defined under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). It is described as unwanted and sexually suggestive behavior or actions that create a hostile or intimidating environment. This could include unwelcome sexual advances, assault, battery, stalking, or credible threats of violence. It’s also important to note that sexual harassment is considered a form of discrimination based on sex/gender, including pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Furthermore, quid pro quo sexual harassment occurs when a term of employment is conditioned on submission to unwelcome sexual advances. Both employers and employees are prohibited from harassing any worker, employee, applicant, volunteer, or independent contractor. It’s worth noting that these laws apply not only to inappropriate conduct motivated by sex or gender but also to any unlawful reasons.

In this blog post, we will explore this intricate issue, delving into the legal nuances and considerations surrounding consent, power dynamics, and the right to a harassment-free workplace.

Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, (1986) 477 U.S. 57

In the seminal case of Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, (1986) 477 U.S. 57 a bank employee sued the bank and her supervisor at the bank, claiming that during her employment at the bank she had been subjected to sexual harassment by the supervisor in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

At the trial, the parties presented conflicting testimony about the existence of a sexual relationship between the employee and the supervisor. The District Court sided with the defense, holding that if the supervisor did have a sexual relationship, it was voluntary and had nothing to do with the employee’s continued employment at the bank, and that therefore the employee was not the victim of sexual harassment. The court then went on to hold that since the bank was without notice, it could not be held liable for the supervisor’s alleged sexual harassment.

The Court of Appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court held in part that the District Court’s findings were insufficient to dispose of respondent’s “hostile environment” claim. The District Court apparently erroneously believed that a sexual harassment claim will not lie absent an economic effect on the complainant’s employment, and erroneously focused on the “voluntariness” of the respondent’s participation in the claimed sexual episodes.

The United States Supreme Court held that the correct inquiry is whether the respondent by her conduct indicated that the alleged sexual advances were unwelcome, not whether her participation in them was voluntary.

The Importance of Context

Evaluating Each Case Individually

Each case of alleged sexual harassment is unique, and the legal analysis involves considering the specific circumstances, power dynamics, and the nature of the conduct in question.

Consultation with Legal Professionals

Victims of sexual harassment are encouraged to consult with legal professionals who specialize in employment law to assess the viability of a legal claim. Attorneys can guide the specific legal protections available and the potential avenues for recourse.

In the context of sexual harassment, voluntary submission to certain acts does not preclude individuals from pursuing legal action. The law recognizes the complexities of power dynamics in professional settings and aims to protect victims from unlawful harassment. Understanding one’s rights and consulting with legal professionals is crucial for individuals navigating the challenging terrain of workplace harassment.

Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. Provides Skilled, Experienced Representation

We are employment lawyers in Southern California who have helped hundreds of clients achieve great results. If you are involved in a dispute involving this area of employment law, our experienced employment lawyers stand ready to help. We help employers understand their obligations, and employees understand their rights. Visit our website to ensure your rights are protected and your voice is heard. Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. provides a complimentary consultation and is proud of our many positive testimonials.