đź“Ś Key Takeaways
Protected Medical Disclosures: Under California’s FEHA, employees who disclose a medical condition—such as a cancer diagnosis—are entitled to protection from adverse employment actions, including termination or reassignment.
Legal Duties of Employers: Employers must engage in a good faith interactive process and consider reasonable accommodations when informed of an employee’s medical condition, as outlined in Gov. Code § 12940.
Indicators of Discrimination: A causal connection between a disclosure and negative job consequences, especially when changes occur shortly after disclosure, may indicate a FEHA violation.
Industry-Specific Patterns: Reported cases from healthcare, manufacturing, and retail suggest potential discrimination patterns following medical disclosures, though each case depends on specific facts.
Importance of Legal Review: Determining whether conduct violates FEHA requires individualized legal analysis and consultation with qualified employment law counsel.
This article provides a structured overview of FEHA medical condition protections and helps readers recognize potential violation patterns that may warrant legal review.
Disclosing a medical condition in the workplace is a moment of vulnerability. Under California law, such disclosures are safeguarded by the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which prohibits discriminatory responses to protected health-related information. This overview focuses on established legal standards that help clarify what may constitute a violation under California FEHA.
Foundational Legal Protections for Medical Conditions
FEHA, under California Government Code § 12940, expressly prohibits discrimination based on a known medical condition. As defined in § 12926, this includes health impairments associated with cancer diagnoses or genetic characteristics tied to potential disease risk.
When employment actions—such as reassignment, negative performance evaluations, or terminations—occur shortly after a medical disclosure, they may raise legal concerns. Under § 12940(a), a causal connection between the disclosure and the adverse action can be a key factor in evaluating discriminatory intent. These assessments rely on circumstantial evidence, including timing, changes in treatment, or inconsistencies in employer explanations.
Laws and interpretations are subject to change. Refer to official California legal sources for the most current statute language.
Employer Misconduct and Accommodation Failures
California employers have an obligation to engage in an interactive process when an employee requests accommodations for a medical condition. Codified in § 12940, this process must be timely, collaborative, and conducted in good faith.
When an employer dismisses such requests outright or fails to explore viable accommodations, it may reflect bad faith. Examples include inflexible work schedules despite medical recommendations or blanket denials without considering modifications. Such actions can reflect noncompliance with FEHA’s accommodation duties.
Retaliation following protected disclosures also falls under legal scrutiny. Gov. Code § 12940 prohibits adverse actions—such as demotion or job reassignment—that occur after an employee requests accommodation or asserts rights under FEHA. Establishing a causal connection between the protected activity and the employer’s response is critical in these scenarios.
Evaluating Violation Indicators
Key elements that may help identify possible FEHA violations include but are not limited to:
- Temporal Proximity: A short time span between disclosure and adverse action may signal a problematic employer response.
- Inconsistent Treatment: Disparities in how similarly situated employees are treated can suggest discriminatory motives.
- Accommodation Process Breakdowns: Lack of documentation or meaningful dialogue about accommodations may reflect legal noncompliance.
While these factors may raise concerns, determining whether a violation occurred requires individualized legal analysis.
Legal Consultation: Why It Matters
FEHA provides significant legal protection—but understanding whether those protections apply to a specific situation involves more than surface-level interpretation. Legal counsel plays an essential role in identifying violations, preserving evidence, and evaluating options.
Immediate legal counsel is critical during active employment disputes involving medical condition disclosures. FEHA violations are deeply fact-dependent, and professional guidance is necessary to navigate those complexities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: Can an employer legally terminate an employee after a medical disclosure?
A: A termination following disclosure may raise legal concerns, but it depends on the presence of a causal connection and the employer’s motivations. This is general information only and not legal advice.
Q: What is considered a “reasonable accommodation” under California law?
A: Reasonable accommodations may include job restructuring, modified schedules, or medical leave. What is “reasonable” varies depending on the job and the employer’s capabilities. Always consult an attorney to assess specific circumstances.
Â
Frequently Unrecognized Questions (FUQs)
Q: Does FEHA cover genetic characteristics linked to future illnesses?
A: Yes. California Gov. Code § 12926(i) includes genetic characteristics related to disease susceptibility. Readers should seek legal advice to understand how this applies to individual situations.
Q: Can an employer delay accommodation responses without violating FEHA?
A: Unjustified delays may reflect bad faith under § 12940(m), especially if no efforts are made to explore alternatives. Each case is fact-specific and should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel.
Disclaimer:
This content is for informational purposes only. This content is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed through this content. Please consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction for legal advice specific to your situation.
Protect Your Rights | The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. | Top Gun Employment Lawyers
Have you been wrongfully terminated from your job? Have you suffered discrimination, harassment, or retaliation in the workplace? Has your employer violated wage and hour laws? If so, we can help. The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. is dedicated to protecting and enforcing employees’ rights throughout Southern California. With a 97% success rate and millions recovered for our clients, our team of experienced and talented employment lawyers can fight to secure the justice you deserve.
Take the First Step Towards Securing Justice: Call us today to speak with one of our experienced employment lawyers. The firm offers case evaluations free of charge.
Contact Us Today:
- Phone:Â (818) 509-9975
- Office Locations: Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura
Important: Contacting the Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C. does not create an attorney-client relationship, but all communications will remain private and confidential. Each case is unique. The Akopyan Law Firm, A.P.C., does not guarantee any outcome.